On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:04 AM Sapphira Armageddos <
shadowkyogre.pub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Say I have a piece of data that has the following relationships:
>
> Character<-(is in)->Setting
> Character<-(is in)->Story (separate file)
> Species-(is a)->Character
> Character-(parent
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 23:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sapphira Armageddos wrote:
> - UNLs: Straightforward, but can lead to needing to manually copy the
> individual UNLs to track bidirectional relationships across files.
> Also allows for commentary on those relationships.
>
> - Backlinks: Tried the plugin,
Took the time to do a writeup for additional clarity. The below describes
the kinds of relationships a character node in the Leo file I'm working on
would have, but I'm not sure if this is the right approach. Currently
relationships use UNLs to denote which characters they affect in their body
Hi everyone!
Been cruising along since I started getting the hang of Leo and scripting for
it. I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out what I should do to handle the
problem below.
Say I have a piece of data that has the following relationships:
Character<-(is in)->Setting
Character<-(is
