Re: Proposal: remove all of Leo's buffer commands

2016-10-20 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Edward K. Ream wrote: The > ​[buffer-*] commands work on Leo nodes. Does anyone ever use them? > ​...​ > Imo, these commands are feeble and should be removed. That would reduce > the cognitive load on newbies just a tad. > ​Thanks for your

Re: Proposal: remove all of Leo's buffer commands

2016-10-20 Thread Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
As someone in between, I agree. :-) On 20/10/16 08:14, Kent Tenney wrote: As a greybeard, I agree. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Propadovic Nenad > wrote: As a newbie, I agree. 2016-10-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Edward K. Ream

Re: Proposal: remove all of Leo's buffer commands

2016-10-20 Thread Kent Tenney
As a greybeard, I agree. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Propadovic Nenad wrote: > As a newbie, I agree. > > 2016-10-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Edward K. Ream : > >> The following commands work on Leo nodes. Does anyone ever use them? >> >>

Re: Proposal: remove all of Leo's buffer commands

2016-10-20 Thread Propadovic Nenad
As a newbie, I agree. 2016-10-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Edward K. Ream : > The following commands work on Leo nodes. Does anyone ever use them? > > buffer-append-to > buffer-copy > buffer-insert > buffer-kill > buffer-prepend-to > buffer-switch-to > > They

Proposal: remove all of Leo's buffer commands

2016-10-20 Thread Edward K. Ream
The following commands work on Leo nodes. Does anyone ever use them? buffer-append-to buffer-copy buffer-insert buffer-kill buffer-prepend-to buffer-switch-to They are based on Emacs buffer commands, but in fact they have to prompt the user for the name of a node!