On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:26:10 -0600
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> So these two lines are equivalent:
>
>
> { TEST (x) { return(x+2) } }
>
> { TEST: function (x) { return(x+2) } }
>
> Edward
http://www.benmvp.com/learning-es6-enhanced-object-literals/
explains a bit more explicitly. But yes.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote:
>
>
>
>> Typing in the Chrome console:
>>
>> a =
>>
>> { TEST (x) { return(x+2) } }
>> a.TEST(2)
>> 4
>>
>
So these two lines are equivalent:
{ TEST (x) { return(x+2) } }
{ TEST: function (x) { return(x+2) } }
Edward
--
You receiv
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Terry Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:12:10 -0800 (PST)
> "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
>
> > These look kinda like function definitions without "function" or "=>".
>
> New to me, but they do seem to be function definitions without function
> or =>
>
> Typing in
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:12:10 -0800 (PST)
"Edward K. Ream" wrote:
> These look kinda like function definitions without "function" or "=>".
New to me, but they do seem to be function definitions without function
or =>
Typing in the Chrome console:
a = { TEST (x) { return(x+2) } }
a.TEST(2)
4
ht