Ahh, I see. Thank you for the clarification. I agree with you assessment.
I realize my previous email was overly inflammatory. Let me restate a
couple of points. Leo does have a brand, but it is underdeveloped. Does it
need developing? Absolutely. My first impression with Leo was its icon and
John,
Have you read my last response in this thread? The logo is not unique,
(as the current one) and can be obtained from svg downloading sites. If
we're going to change the current logo, we could search for one that
identifies the community and Leo in a non-generic way.
Cheers,
Offray
Amine, the proposed logo is beautiful. It's crisp and geometrically
striking, this is a "strong" and "proud" lion. This represents most of what
you would want in a logo.
I will counter Edward's argument. First, Leo does not really have a "brand"
at this point, it has a small following. Leo's
Hi,
On 12/10/16 10:21, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 4:04:46 AM UTC-5, Amine JS wrote:
> Hello, I like this editor and I think it's way better than many
other editors out there, after using it for some time,I thought I
could do a new logo and icon.
I appreciate the
On Monday, October 10, 2016 at 4:04:46 AM UTC-5, Amine JS wrote:
> Hello, I like this editor and I think it's way better than many other
editors out there, after using it for some time,I thought I could do a new
logo and icon.
I appreciate the work you have done with the Logo, but I am not
I really liked, and I like more that the current one. As far as I know,
current Icon was taken from Internet, while this is an original design
for us.
Cheers,
Offray
On 09/10/16 06:20, Amine JS wrote:
Hello, I like this editor and I think it's way better than many other
editors out