Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Updated acme-tiny to fix agreement url error

Hi: On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Sebastien Badia wrote: > Should be ok, I just bumped compat version to 10, and sponsored your package. > I'll take a look to provide a package for stable. Thanks for your help Sebastien! Cheers, -- Jeremías

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Updated acme-tiny to fix agreement url error

Hi: Sorry for the delay... On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Sebastien Badia wrote: > Hello, > > Indeed, thanks Daniel for the heads up! > Jeremías, can I help on this ? > > acme-tiny is currently unusable inside Debian (refs: > https://bugs.debian.org/882693) I just pushed to

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Updated acme-tiny to fix agreement url error

Hi Daniel: On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Daniel Roesler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Howdy, > > I just wanted to give you a heads up that the hardcoded > agreement url in your 20160801-3 no longer works. I fixed > this upstream, so you can

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] acme-tiny backport

Hi Mattia: On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > @Jeremías: > > I noticed that the acme-tiny backport is not up to date with what's in > stretch. > Could you please take care of updating it (as backports policy > theoretically require, this page should

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#841919: Bug#841919: Bug#841919: acme-tiny: Please provide a backport for jessie

Hi Mattia: On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 21:56:23 + Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi! :) > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 06:39:42PM -0300, Jeremías Casteglione wrote: > > > It would be nice to have a backported package of acme-tiny for > > > Jessie. > &g

[Letsencrypt-devel] acme-tiny 20160326-1: new release, bug fixes

Hi: I just pushed to master branch a new version of the package (commit 8543dcd), which includes a new upstream release and some reported bug fixes. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/letsencrypt/acme-tiny.git The debian/changelog entries are: * new upstream release (Closes: #824602) *

[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#821791: Bug#821791: acme-tiny: Source package includes modified source in .orig.tar.gz

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:03:38 +0200 Tomaž Šolc wrote: > Another solution would be to state in the copyright file that the > package upstream is your repo, not diafygi's. > > As it is right now, there is no mention of > "https://github.com/jrmsgit/acme-tiny; anywhere in the

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#821791: acme-tiny: Source package includes modified source in .orig.tar.gz

Hi Tomaž: Thanks for reporting this! On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:06:17 +0200 Tomaž Šolc wrote: > Package: acme-tiny > Version: 20151229-4 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > it appears that acme-tiny source package includes Debian-specific > modifications in

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] acme-tiny_20151229-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi Axel: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:46:17 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote: > I though found one more (less severe, i.e. non-functional) typo in the > man page: "ownsership" should be "ownership" (one superfluous "s"). Just pushed a couple of commits to fix that typo and also to fix the

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] acme-tiny_20151229-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:19:34 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote: > Axel Beckert wrote: > > Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > binary:acme-tiny is NEW. > > > > Small bug report after having a look at > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/acme-tiny_20151229-1.html: > > > > Vcs-Git:

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#815199: ITP: acme-tiny -- letsencrypt tiny python client

Hi: Thank you all again for your help with this. On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 17:53:59 -0800 Francois Marier wrote: > On 2016-03-04 at 21:43:38, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > Took a look over it; it looks in good shape! (The only thing I can > > see, very nitpicky, is that you