Re:

2005-08-31 Thread order
Уважаемые господа! Предлагаем поставки разнообразной продукции иностранного производства по интересующим Вас ценам и услуги по поиску поставщиков и организации поставок. Наша компания уже 5 лет занимается организацией Внешнеэкономических связей, импортно-экспортными операциями и

Re: Upcoming changes for xorg

2005-08-31 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Mit, 2005-08-31 at 20:52 +0100, Richard A Downing wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: FYI, I found this link today. http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-June/008325.html This will be a major update to xorg and I would guess we will need to integrate it into BLFS sometime in

hierarchical run-level rc script

2005-08-31 Thread Tushar Teredesai
After being tired of maintaining the gazillion symlinks in /etc/rc.d/rc.*, I finally decided to write a simplistic rc script that is controlled from a single config file and operates in a hierarchical fashion. Interested folks can check out

Re: Package Dependencies

2005-08-31 Thread Tushar Teredesai
Sorry for the late reply, still going thru some old mail that I received while on vacation. On 8/25/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ldd in-of-itself is no indication that a package is actually a dependency. Libtiff could have easily been called into the build because it was a

Re: Package Dependencies

2005-08-31 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 8/31/05, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the late reply, still going thru some old mail that I received while on vacation. On 8/25/05, Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ldd in-of-itself is no indication that a package is actually a dependency. Libtiff could

Re: Upcoming changes for xorg

2005-08-31 Thread Andrew Benton
Jürg Billeter wrote: BTW: The modular/monolithic decision will be irrelevant for future releases as 6.9 will be the last monolithic release. I've not been keeping up with this at all. What does it mean to build X modular or monolithic? What's the difference, what's the big idea? --

Re: Upcoming changes for xorg

2005-08-31 Thread Jürg Billeter
On Mit, 2005-08-31 at 22:17 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: Jürg Billeter wrote: BTW: The modular/monolithic decision will be irrelevant for future releases as 6.9 will be the last monolithic release. I've not been keeping up with this at all. What does it mean to build X modular or

suggest: add two symbolic link

2005-08-31 Thread Duloc Wen
hi I have just finish lfs SVN-20050828, spending 2 days after that, i want to make a cramfs image, so i use: mkcramfs and finding it didn't work so i go download mkcramfs , build and install i was so so angry finding the /sbin/mkfs.cramfs exist so i suggest to add and symbolic link: ln -s

Re: Pushing UTF-8 support into LFS

2005-08-31 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 8/6/05, Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a sample LFS-like system that supports UTF-8 is available on a live CD. So, it may be a good idea to create an experimental branch of the LFS book that incorporates the same changes. LFS built according to that