I'm afraid I'm overlooking something obvious, I still get the same
error following the Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20050930-Sparc64 book.
From configure:
(...nothing suspicious before...)
checking for long double... no
checking size of long double... 0
running configure fragment for
Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message de news:
Looks like you forgot the Sparc TLS patch for glibc.
Pretty sure not (though never sure), below the script I'm using with it's
output:
$ more *11.sh
export PATH=/cross-tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
export LC_ALL=POSIX
unset CFLAGS
unset
Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message de news:
Looks like you forgot the Sparc TLS patch for glibc.
Pretty sure not (though never sure), below the script I'm using with it's
output:
$ more *11.sh
export PATH=/cross-tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
export LC_ALL=POSIX
unset CFLAGS
unset
Hmm,
This is wierd, in you have patched your binutils and glibc for tls
sparc you shouldn't be having this issue. What is your host distro?
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote:
Manuel and LFS-dev,
I have been thinking about this for a few days. Cross-LFS has two
different options in it, boot and chroot. Boot is a complete reboot and
chroot is like the standard LFS book. Talking with various people, an idea
popped into my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Anderson Lizardo wrote:
FIY, the Subversion commit messages need always to be written either
in Unicode or plain ASCII, so svn log --xml can output valid XML
data. So please, setup your favorite editor to one of these
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
I suggest dumping and restoring. With my toy repository at
file:///home/patrakov/svn-test, the sequence of actions is:
snip
I understand that with fsfs this sequence of actions may be suboptimal.
With fsfs, that's as easy as editing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
With fsfs, that's as easy as editing
/home/svn/repositories/LFS/db/revprops/6803 on belgarath. Don't forget
to change V 160 to V 161. BTW it looks like I have enough
permissions to do that :) Do you want me to fix
Anderson Lizardo wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
With fsfs, that's as easy as editing
/home/svn/repositories/LFS/db/revprops/6803 on belgarath. Don't forget
to change V 160 to V 161. BTW it looks like I have enough
permissions to do that :) Do you want me to fix the log or prefer doing
