On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Ryan Oliver wrote:
example patch for x86_64 lib64 attached (rename it to something
appropriate)
Thanks, I'll play with one of those later.
Just thought I'd pipe up here... what use is there having both 32 and
64bit modules created if you are only going to be able
Richard A Downing wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote:
there
may well be some packages we should add that ONLY work in Chinese or
Japanese in the longer term (we may be asked to do this by new friends,
and we should be open to that idea). I emphasise though that
n 10/20/05, David Fix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd just use jed instead of emacs. ;) There's no lisp in it, but it works
pretty much the same... Same key bindings, etc... But faster!
I'm rather partial to emacs. I may change my mind though. But when I
tried jed
On 10/20/05, Doug Ronne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only once managed to hack the gettext configure to not believe emacs
existed, so it always tries to compile lisp support or some such and
always fails if I don't have emacs in my toolchain, but do have it on
my host.
I haven't been here long,
