Hi everyone!
After completing my school's final
exams, I found time to do the LFS build.
Here is a quick summary:
I used the development LFS book version 20080423
but the newest available packages.
As for the system specs, it is a 32bit system running
the actual LFS live CD at build time.
I
On Fri, May 09, at 12:02 Philipp Christian Loewner wrote:
First I had installed udev-120 but my system didn't
boot. It turned out to be a problem due to missing
kernel features, but I didn't recompile 120 after
I had installed 113 then.
Perhaps a hint in the book saying which kernel
Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
In my opinion the kernel page is too sparse and static for its
significance.
I agree.
Linux development is rapid these days, so its mission impossible for a
man to follow all that new exciting stuff.
It's always rapid. Keeping up requires daily effort.
Years
On Thu, 08 May 2008 22:47:42 +0200, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Years ago, I suggested a whole chapter or a new book, for the Kernel
related stuff [boot process (init ...), udev, filesystems, virtual
machines, etc...].
We did also found the man (Alexander) who could
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:47:42PM +0300, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
Now I am in a position that I don't know if we should continue with LFS,
as development doesn't simple happen anymore.
The new gcc is out for months,
I'm not doing _any_ book development at the moment (hope to get
away
Ken Moffat wrote:
I'm guessing 4.3.1 will be out soon, and that it will be worth
playing with.
I've done some testing with 4.3.0 as well. It's a little cranky. And
based on similar reports I also decided to hold off working on updating
-dev until a new release. Otherwise, I may have added it
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
release
sometime this summer.
At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
sans package manager.
However, x86_64 support (and PowerPC, for that matter) is pretty much
ready
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
Since I see a mention of udev:
Over the past couple weeks, I've started to
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
To be current, I'd also like to see the Udev blocker sorted out before
we release 7.0. See: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057
Since I see a mention of udev:
Over the past
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jeremy Huntwork
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
In any case, I don't see a reason that there won't be a LFS 6.4 or 7.0
release
sometime this summer.
At the current rate, if we do LFS 7.0 this summer it would have to be
sans package
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
the boot loader issue .. eventually.
Don't apologize. :) Dropping in is welcome.
Just FYI.
Thanks for the reminder, Dennis. I'll
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Sorry to drop in. I just wanted you to know that I was still out here
working on this little embedded PPC device and that I was getting to
the boot loader issue .. eventually.
Don't
Dennis Clarke wrote:
you know .. I really like the atmosphere in the LFS project.
Such a nice bunch of people.
Oh, we've had our moments. You don't even have to go very far back in
the archives to read some. :(
But I think, on the whole, we all prefer a nicer, friendlier atmosphere,
and we
13 matches
Mail list logo
