Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-08-23 03:10, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jasmine Iwanek wrote: > >> There's a xz compressed version of >> e2fsprogs available at: >> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs/v1.42.5/ >> >> for those interested, might want to add it to the book. > > Thanks for the heads up, but I t

Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-08-23 03:05, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jasmine Iwanek wrote: >> Attached is a few cleanups to grammar and fixes for inconsistent use >> of >> terminology throughout the book. > > - are included that are not strictly required. The lists below > document the > + are included that are not strict

Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/22/12 21:05 CST: > I think the difference between GB and gigabytes is more style than > grammar. I'd like other opinions. You can use either. It certainly is not grammar. It is totally interchangeable. > In one place you change "five gigabyte" to "5 gigabyte

Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jasmine Iwanek wrote: > There's a xz compressed version of > e2fsprogs available at: > http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs/v1.42.5/ > > for those interested, might want to add it to the book. Thanks for the heads up, but I think we can wait until the next version. Has e2f

Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jasmine Iwanek wrote: > Attached is a few cleanups to grammar and fixes for inconsistent use of > terminology throughout the book. - are included that are not strictly required. The lists below document the + are included that are not strictly required. The lists below documents the They docum

Re: [lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
On 2012-08-23 02:45, Jasmine Iwanek wrote: > Attached is a few cleanups to grammar and fixes for inconsistent use > of terminology throughout the book. Replying to myself here, but there's a xz compressed version of e2fsprogs available at: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/e2fsprogs

[lfs-dev] Minor cleanups and consistancy fixes

2012-08-22 Thread Jasmine Iwanek
Attached is a few cleanups to grammar and fixes for inconsistent use of terminology throughout the book. diff -urN LFS/trunk/BOOK/chapter02/creatingpartition.xml LFS.edited/trunk/BOOK/chapter02/creatingpartition.xml --- LFS/trunk/BOOK/chapter02/creatingpartition.xml 2012-08-23 03:28:25.0 +

[lfs-dev] Possible gcc problem

2012-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
Just a heads-up that on at least one box (mine), gcc-4.7.1 might be problematic for the kernel in certain circumstances. I've been using 3.5.0 on the LFS-7.1 system on this box, and it is fine. Didn't have time to upgrade the kernel, but 3.5.2 came out during my latest build - so, I dropped tha

Re: [lfs-dev] rpc headers from glibc

2012-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
William Harrington wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another >> configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the >> rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which >> glibc us

Re: [lfs-dev] rpc headers from glibc

2012-08-22 Thread William Harrington
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another > configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the > rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which > glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2

Re: [lfs-dev] [blfs-dev] Introduction

2012-08-22 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Anyway, I'm glad to be back and I look forward to getting back working > on the BLFS book again. I must really have stopped paying attention, I thought you were still leading the BLFS effort! Anyway, welcome back! I'm certain the various proj

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.61. Udev-188 path error.

2012-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
xinglp wrote: > make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs > make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs install > bash udev-lfs-188/init-net-rules.sh > > should be > > make -f udev-lfs/Makefile.lfs > make -f udev-lfs/Makefile.lfs install > bash udev-lfs/init-net-rules.sh > > or change the tarball Yes, I just found

[lfs-dev] Glibc nss_db and nscd FHS paths

2012-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/22/2012 05:07 PM, kre...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: > Author: krejzi > Date: 2012-08-22 09:06:59 -0600 (Wed, 22 Aug 2012) > New Revision: 2517 > > Added: > trunk/glibc/glibc-2.16.0-fhs-1.patch > Log: > Fix glibc nscd and nss_db paths to be compatible with FHS. > > Added: trunk/glibc/glib

Re: [lfs-dev] rpc headers from glibc

2012-08-22 Thread Armin K.
On 08/20/2012 06:56 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > When I was looking at fedora, I noticed that they use another > configure switch: --enable-obsolete-rpc. Adding that installs the > rpc and rpcsvc headers (as well as the rpcsvc pascal .x files which > glibc used to install [ I looked at 2.12.2 ]. > >

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.61. Udev-188 path error.

2012-08-22 Thread xinglp
There are also somethings like below in the file Makefile.lfs @cp -v udev-lfs-$(VERSION)/write*$(DESTDIR)/lib/udev -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-dev] 6.61. Udev-188 path error.

2012-08-22 Thread xinglp
make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs make -f udev-lfs-188/Makefile.lfs install bash udev-lfs-188/init-net-rules.sh should be make -f udev-lfs/Makefile.lfs make -f udev-lfs/Makefile.lfs install bash udev-lfs/init-net-rules.sh or change the tarball -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs