On 02/24/2013 04:03 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/23/13 20:13 CST:
I still am not in favor of putting this in LFS-7.3. It's so much easier
to omit the .info build completely and, of course, there is no sense at
all in building it in Chapter 5.
I really don't
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 08:13:36PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
It turns out that the above warning does not actually stop the build
like s/item/itemx/ does.
Leave it with me - even if a larger patch does solve everything, I
guess a workaround will still be needed in chapter 5 for building
Le 23/02/2013 22:52, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:24:54AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
Cheers, I've just been preparing one (without the three ChangeLog
parts). Attached.
I don't think that's enough. The first failure is in
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 23/02/2013 22:52, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
I'm inclined right now to leave things alone. The book will build now,
just without the .info file. I suspect that the next gcc release,
whether it will be 4.8 or 4.7.3, will address the issue.
I tested one of the latest
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 23/02/2013 22:52, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
I'm inclined right now to leave things alone. The book will build now,
just without the .info file. I suspect that the next gcc release,
whether it will be 4.8 or 4.7.3, will address the issue.
I tested
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:31:23PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 23/02/2013 22:52, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Good point. I didn't notice that they were there by default. If the
.info files are present, then there is no need to build them at all.
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:31:23PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
Le 23/02/2013 22:52, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
Good point. I didn't notice that they were there by default. If the
.info files are present, then there is no need to build
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 05:02:49PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Of course we are not building Fortran or Ada or Java, but with the
commands I wrote earlier, I do have the following in /usr/share/info:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 240866 Feb 24 19:13 cpp.info
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50231 Feb 24
Ken Moffat wrote:
For anyone who builds ada (really ? why ? :) in BLFS, I guess they
are going to be missing the ada info files.
I did some Ada coding once (1990s), but not for production. It has
*very* strong type checking and is sometimes used where very high
reliability is needed.
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/24/13 17:45 CST:
Ken Moffat wrote:
For anyone who builds ada (really ? why ? :) in BLFS, I guess they
are going to be missing the ada info files.
I did some Ada coding once (1990s), but not for production. It has
*very* strong type checking and is
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/24/13 17:45 CST:
Ken Moffat wrote:
For anyone who builds ada (really ? why ? :) in BLFS, I guess they
are going to be missing the ada info files.
I did some Ada coding once (1990s), but not for production. It has
*very* strong
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 06:45:26PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Nitpick: Its Ada, not ADA. Ada stands for Augusta Ada King, Countess
of Lovelace, the first programmer. She worked with Charles Babbage.
-- Bruce
See :
Ken Moffat wrote:
http://www.cvaieee.org/html/humor/programming_history.html
2008? Isn't it time for us to invent another language? Or should we
leave it to some desperate Ph.D. student looking for a dissertation topic?
:-)
-- Bruce
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
