[lfs-dev] LFS 7.4-rc2 Release

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
The Linux From Scratch community announces the release of LFS Version 7.4-rc2. This is the second release candidate on the road to LFS-7.4. The changes from 7.4-rc1 include a one-line revision to glibc to revert an upstream change that causes problems on some architectures. The linux kernel

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.4-rc2 Release

2013-08-30 Thread Kevin Lyda
A very self-serving question but I have an LFS class starting on 11 Sept. Any chance 7.4 will be released by then? :) Kevin -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.4-rc2 Release

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Kevin Lyda wrote: A very self-serving question but I have an LFS class starting on 11 Sept. Any chance 7.4 will be released by then? :) If we don't run into new problems, our new target date is September 8. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ:

[lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Ken Moffat
I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the manpage it couldn't open.

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 30-08-2013 22:24, Ken Moffat escreveu: I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or man anything) didn't work for a regular user -

Re: [lfs-dev] Odd 'man' perms in my -rc

2013-08-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: I'm just rebuilding my current desktop on -rc2. Got to the end of my xorg script and couldn't remember which git command uses tcl (which I build straight after xorg). It's gitk, but 'man git' (or man anything) didn't work for a regular user - instead it listed the