I've been working trying to understand Git a little better and trying to
evaluate whether it is appropriate for LFS to migrate.
What I've done is to copy the alfs repository to anduin and work with
that copy.
Note to Pierre: nothing has been changed on the lfs server.
I had to reorganize the
I've just noticed that someone on CLFS ran 'make headers_check' and
feared that the usual error reports (from kexec.h and soundcard.h)
about userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the
kernel were errors.
In theory, running make headers_check allows _kernel_ devs to
check
Ken Moffat wrote:
I've just noticed that someone on CLFS ran 'make headers_check' and
feared that the usual error reports (from kexec.h and soundcard.h)
about userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the
kernel were errors.
In theory, running make headers_check allows
Sites like github, bitbucket, code.google.com or gitorious all offer
free hosting and nice webui's for people to more easily provide
patches. It eases the git learning curve for people, it reduces
bandwidth usage on your server and it lowers the bar to participation.
Running your own git server
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Kevin Lyda ke...@ie.suberic.net wrote:
Sites like github, bitbucket, code.google.com or gitorious all offer
free hosting and nice webui's for people to more easily provide
patches. It eases the git learning curve for people, it reduces
bandwidth usage on your
On Mar 9, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been working trying to understand Git a little better and
trying to
evaluate whether it is appropriate for LFS to migrate.
Here is an article which presents why a person should move to GIT.
William Harrington wrote:
On Mar 9, 2014, at 6:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've been working trying to understand Git a little better and
trying to
evaluate whether it is appropriate for LFS to migrate.
Here is an article which presents why a person should move to GIT.
On Mar 9, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Well there is a difference between LFS and BLFS. Although there are
several devs authorized to commit to LFS, in the last cycle only Matt
and I did so. BLFS had seven committers in the same cycle. Generally
the only collisions I see are in
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com -
#?^€^ ! I managed to send the reply to blfs instead of lfs.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 09:16:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Merging is generally not needed by me, but that may be the reason Armin
wants to move to git. I
Ken Moffat wrote:
- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com -
#?^€^ ! I managed to send the reply to blfs instead of lfs.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 09:16:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Merging is generally not needed by me, but that may be the reason Armin
wants
On Mar 9, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
The big benefit of svn is increasing decimal revision numbers.
I saw a while back this for a pre-commit hook.
What you could end up with is a pre-commit hook which would include in
the comment a revision number, with an algo not involving
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:06:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
The great benefit of git is in branches - in svn, a branch is cast
in stone and is a PITA. In git, branches are just pointers. If
you want to maintain a stable branch, you can cherry-pick specific
commits
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:06:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
The great benefit of git is in branches - in svn, a branch is cast
in stone and is a PITA. In git, branches are just pointers. If
you want to maintain a stable branch, you can cherry-pick
13 matches
Mail list logo
