On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:22:01 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 07/06/2013 09:53 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Armin K. wrote:
> >>> We probably missed this one:
> >>>
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/hotplug/udev.git/plain/README
> >>>
> >>> Requirements:
> >>> - Version
in the line. If you see it once, you will know it is now default.
>
I have tried that, no the flag does not appear. But why would it if the
default was otherwise? I have tried no flag, '-fomit-frame-pointer'
and '-fno-omit-frame-pointer' with no difference in the cpp binar
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:38:06 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> David Jensen wrote:
>
> > The point of the thread is that the 'chapter 5 gcc pass 2' and the
> > 'chapter 6 gcc' instructions and explanations are inconsistent,
> > confusing and wrong for all b
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:59:35 -0600
Stuart Stegall wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, David Jensen
> wrote:
> > Note: Section 5.10, “GCC-4.5.1 - Pass 2” does not use a case
> > statement for the frame-pointer. Problematic for x86_64? Perhaps
> > both sections sh
Note: Section 5.10, “GCC-4.5.1 - Pass 2” does not use a case statement
for the frame-pointer. Problematic for x86_64? Perhaps both sections
should be:
case `uname -m` in
i?86 | x86_64) sed -i 's/^T_CFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' \
gcc/Makefile.in ;;
esac
--
. It 'may' be incorrect but it
flows off the tongue better.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
urn off broken EIP translation
so, I'm using
loadproc klogd -c 3 -x
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
nux /boot/lfskernel-2.6.30.5 root=/dev/sdb2 ro }
should be set root=(hd1,1) partitions start at 0, same as drives.
maybe
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:00:52 -0700
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> ...
> it's time that I step away from my duties as an editor for LFS and
> BLFS.
>
Dan,
I will miss your input! Please keep in touch.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
nit.d/checkfs script. Tested with the help of Andre
Müller. Fix suggested by Zack
Doesn't really matter, but it should be ASCII.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
discussions before in the past. I'm honestly not
> sure anymore what the outcome of that was.
>
> Gerard
I need ppp, I have no use for dhcp.
ymmv
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
d PM
selection are where the problems are. All supported PM's in all
Packages/Modules: That is a great endeavor.
That's my take.
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I saw in a Genntoo newletter: Gettext-0.17, in LFS-SVN, includes a
subset of libXML.
Investigating, it includes a small subset of glib, a large subset of
libXML and all of libcroco. Rebuilding using the installed packages is
broken, configure doesn't correctly detect libXML and mangles the
-I
I expect it works as advertised. It is
complete to start a deployment POC. Note though: Agnostic PM's
including a 'basic no pm' need be supported in the POC. we already know
it can be done.
Where is Manuel? His input would be helpful.
As always, your insight and productivity
[ ] Can't be used to transfer packages to another machine
> [ ] Interferes with config.site files described in DIY-linux
> [~] Will clobber configuration files wen upgrading package versions
> [X] Doesn't explain how to package software beyond BLFS
> [ ] Requires lear
George Makrydakis wrote:
> You know what? This can work on windows as well.
LOL, and joe-sixpack visits LFS and clicks install ubuntu clone now!
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the ab
tly, with odreex.
>
> Tell me what you think.
I think you're on track. Excepting only that 'I' think XML is 'cutting
butter with a chainsaw'. XML is unambiguous and if auto-generated I
won't object.
That said, are you thinking a lib and or libs and implementations or
just the mod/standalone implementations. Gui?
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
The discussions on PM's have been interesting,
> I favour using an existing PM, but other than that, I'm easy.
Also handling overlapping dependencies between modules requires a PM
that checks what is already installed.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailm
George Makrydakis wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2008 00:55:04 David Jensen wrote:
>> If I might suggest: Use Gerard as an arbiter, it is his project.
>>
>
> Glad to hear about this.
>
Don't mention it. At my age, I need reminded, can't say if Gerar
ld be of mutual benefit. In private.
>
If I might suggest: Use Gerard as an arbiter, it is his project.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:31:28PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I would like to see UTF-8 in LFS.
>
> I thought it was? Or at least, I thought LFS was UTF-8-ready. (I don't
> think we want to enforce UTF-8 on everyone, though.)
>
>> I'm not sure I like using XML for
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> David Jensen wrote:
>
>> Until we update glib, cairo, atk, pango and gtk everything is behind the
>> 8-ball.
>>
>
> Agreed. I will update all the above packages by the end of the
> upcoming weekend. I'll also place a note in t
http://mooedit.sourceforge.net/
Though it is CMMI, documentation is scant, and some notes on run-time
configuration files could be a help. Any way I think it could be added
to the book, or just noted in other editors.
thoughts from editors?
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blf
David Jensen wrote:
grrrlgeek wrote:
make check should only be issued after make install. It barfs
spectacularly if run before install.
Hmmm, it didn't barf here.
I'll try it again on a partition were it isn't installed.
It still didn't barf here. I moved it anywa
bly should be in BLFS. It's not a FAQ but there was a thread
last month (fontconfig) and again now this month.
If a person installs in /usr the iconv.h header is a goner. Probably it
could be pulled from he glibc tarball, I haven't looked.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfro
-3.4.2 is out, Bruce committed
3.4.1 yesterday! :-)
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
While downloading File-4.14 I saw there is an official patch in.
ftp://ftp.gw.com/mirrors/pub/unix/file/
It appears to fix 2 minor nits in the mime types..
I can re-diff it to LFS standards and commit it to Patches.
I can't add it to the BOOK(s) though.
fwiw
--
David Jensen
--
tried this? Feedback?
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
nd aclocal. Version maintenance definitely
required.
Whatever, it's messy as is.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
A very minor nitpick. Recent versions of sed install sed.html in
/usr/share/doc. I'd rather see it in a sub-dir.
Attached is a svn diff.
fwiw
--
David Jensen
Index: chapter06/sed.xml
===
--- chapter06/sed.xml (rev
David Jensen wrote:
Kim McCall wrote:
In BLFS, Chap6, sec2, " Emacs-21.4a," which I access as
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/emacs.html
under "Short Descriptions" you list "b2m" twice, with different
descriptions.
I'm reasonably c
ond one wants to be "ctags" instead.
Thanks for all your incredible work,
Kim
Wrong list, But I will CC blfs-dev, and fix it.
Thanks for the report.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
th:
sed -i 's:pkg_failed=yes]):&\nelse:' pkg.m4
I will add that. And I will continue with but not commit the name
change, just to be doing something.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Un
/, until everyone is caught up. More likely, they will revert it.
Any one have an opinion? I think I may change the bug to unassigned :-)
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
ust: unset CFLAGS
maybe
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
quot; },
{ 114, "GPG_ERR_EALREADY" },
{ 52, "GPG_ERR_EBADE" },
{ 9, "GPG_ERR_EBADF" },
{ 77, "GPG_ERR_EBADFD" },
no error! with Andersen's "EOF" not EOF.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Does anyone know why these libtool files are useful? I have been
deleting all the .la files without any problems.
I *guess* for libs in /usr/lib they are 'hood ornaments'.
ymmv
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
this seems a short-coming of the supplied ltmain.sh's. However I
have not been successful hacking them.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Matthew Burgess wrote:
David Jensen wrote:
I noticed on linking a gtkmm app that the gcc source directory is
listed as a library directory. e.g.
(snip)
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/tools
/build, yours will say /sources or whatever you
used. Cat /usr/lib/libstdc++.la and libsup++ to see what you have.
I expect this is pulled into the .la all c++ libraries, I have 28
more with the noise now. Just wondering if we should remove it when we
install gcc.
thoughts?
--
David Jensen
9: error: (near initialization for `labels[0]')
and so on.
Balsa 2.3.3 is good, 2.3 branch is said to be *semi-development*
should we use it. Do you want me to test it. :-)
thoughts?
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
David Jensen wrote:
I don't think it's a big thing, BLFS sbu ratios would then be
*slightly* high.
Few would notice.
actually I think all the values could be grep'd, cut, adjusted with a
ratio and sed'd, all in a for loop.
Anyone up to the script?
--
osing this for post-6.1.
I don't think it's a big thing, BLFS sbu ratios would then be
*slightly* high.
Few would notice.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
David Jensen wrote:
Yes, but it is huge, see the size of the
flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-4.patch, it is all in there. 924K.
It seems easier, perhaps 'more pure' to regenerate locally.
Wait, there is more in the -4.patch than needed. So it's not that bad,
skel.c and scan.c pat
Matthew Burgess wrote:
David Jensen wrote:
1. The order of the files in flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-2.patch may
sometimes trigger regenerating scan.c, which causes the build to fail
if flex is not already installed.
-- Solution: Move the scan.c section of the patch to after the
scan.l
David Jensen wrote:
I'll try to find the livecd scripts and see if the other problems are
addressed.
Nope: problems 2 and 3 are not addressed.
--
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
David Jensen wrote:
-- Solution: Move the scan.c section of the patch to after the
scan.l section. Build and install per the current instructions. Goto 2.
patch -Z -Np1 -i flex-2.5.31-debian_fixes-2.patch
Note the "-Z" option which causes dates
/flex
I could file a bug.
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
David Jensen wrote:
touch -t 0303311951 scan.l
make
make install
touch scan.l
make
make install
Still blathering. Looks like we also need to touch flex.skl before the
second
make. Alternately the scan.l and flex.skl patch fragments could be
moved to a second patch, then applied before the
patched scan.l. But it's luck of the
draw if the timestamps differ, and we have no flex at that point
anyway. I think we must:
touch -t 0303311951 scan.l
make
make install
touch scan.l
make
make install
IMHO, sorry if I am posting some of this twice, just clarifying!
--
D
I
rebuild now, the flex bin is the virtually the same as my build. If I
touch 'scan.l' before make, both scan.c and the flex bin are
significantly larger.
I'm going to change my script to:
touch -t 0303311951 scan.l
make
make install
touch scan.l
make
make install
till someone say
If the untar'd dir were copied with 'cp' rather than 'cp -a', the
timestamps would be all wrong. That would force the flex attempt.
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I'm guessing current development has moved to fsf, but the download link
is still to kernel.org which i think is hjl?
It should be fixed?
---
David Jensen
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above inform
53 matches
Mail list logo
