On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:49:25PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2143611/
I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2143611/
Now I'm just doing a fresh 7.3 install to test some changes I
Ken Moffat wrote:
I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2143611/
Now I'm just doing a fresh 7.3
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
I'd seen comments on the kernel list about bc being required in
3.9, and then forgotten about them (on my desktops I have it anyway,
for xscreensaver). It gets used for kernel/timeconst.h
On 04/01/2013 04:59:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I don't mind adding it to LFS. It's one of the first things I build
because I use it in my scripts for measuring build size.
An additional package to move from LFS might be lsb_release-1.4 to
complement what we have in Section 9.1.
And I had bc
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
Just a random note, but I've been building LFS systems using busybox as
the base system for years now. (I spent several years making that work.
:)
At risk of taking this even further off-topic ...
Have any of the LFS
