On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 09:45:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
[ rude words : someone didn't log 3.11.4 in the Changelog - I'm
building with 3.11.1 headers, but I doubt that will make any real
difference to anything ]
It looks like it's in the change log dated
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 00:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt Burgess wrote:
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
too big to hit lfs-book; the changes to our customisation layers were
From: Matt Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:47:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used
akhiezer wrote:
From: Matt Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 07:47:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets
Matt Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 00:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt Burgess wrote:
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
too big to hit lfs-book; the changes to our customisation
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:17:11 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
((More widely, xml is anyhow an in(s)ane way of structuring the core data
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:17:11 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
((More widely, xml is anyhow an in(s)ane way
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:17:11 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
((More widely, xml is anyhow an in(s)ane way of structuring
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:53:07 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
akhiezer wrote:
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:17:11 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:53:36 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: LFS Developers Mailinglist lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Update to docbook stylesheets
.
.
((More widely, xml is anyhow an in(s)ane way of structuring the core
data
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:25 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt Burgess wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 00:08 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Matt Burgess wrote:
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 19:54 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
Well, I've made some progress already, just by copying and pasting the
original xsl:template from the upstream autoidx.xsl file. I'm now
working on adjusting it to match the current formatting. Hopefully I'll
have something ready in no
Ken Moffat wrote:
[ rude words : someone didn't log 3.11.4 in the Changelog - I'm
building with 3.11.1 headers, but I doubt that will make any real
difference to anything ]
It looks like it's in the change log dated 2013-10-06.
-- Bruce
--
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
too big to hit lfs-book; the changes to our customisation layers were
minimal, the majority of the commit is adding the upstream stylesheets
and deleting the
Matt Burgess wrote:
Hi,
I've just committed r10355 which updates the stylesheets used to
generate the LFS book to docbook-xsl-1.78.1. The commit is likely far
too big to hit lfs-book; the changes to our customisation layers were
minimal, the majority of the commit is adding the upstream
15 matches
Mail list logo
