LFS is source code based distro. So compilers are required. You can't
compare it to binary distros.
I would suggest you take what you like from LFS and Gregs DIY. Develop
a build environment and create what ever kind of binary image you
want. But you really shouldn't demand others to do all the wo
Randy
McMurchy
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 17:01
An: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Betreff: Re: AW: Community discussion: including any devel-tools in LFS
Chap. 6
Feldmeier Bernd wrote these words on 12/21/05 09:44 CST:
> absolutely not against the goal of LFS,
> because pointing out
Feldmeier Bernd wrote these words on 12/21/05 09:44 CST:
> absolutely not against the goal of LFS,
> because pointing out how a sane working
> system can be created has nothing to do
> with any dev-tools installed.
A "sane working system". Is this what you call a bare-bones
just-finished LFS bui
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2005 16:49
An: LFS Developers Mailinglist
Betreff: Re: AW: Community discussion: including any devel-tools in LFS
Chap. 6
Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
> Well, Archaic as subjected before
> we could discuss that.
>
> I think it is
> absolutely not a
Feldmeier Bernd wrote:
Hi,
Well, Archaic as subjected before
we could discuss that.
I think it is
absolutely not against the goal of LFS,
because pointing out how a sane working
system can be created has nothing to do
with any dev-tools installed.
Further more I would like to her
some comme
Hi,
Well, Archaic as subjected before
we could discuss that.
I think it is
absolutely not against the goal of LFS,
because pointing out how a sane working
system can be created has nothing to do
with any dev-tools installed.
Further more I would like to her
some comments from others on this
tou
