Stephen Liu wrote:
is there any opinon on this
newly released Slackware 10.2.
Slackware uses an obsolete 2.4 kernel. You'll need to compile a 2.6 kernel before you start. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html
Andy
--
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I don't think, blah, blah...
probably not the place to ask.
Why are you posting this to LFS-Dev?
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Andrew Benton wrote:
Stephen Liu wrote: stuff
Apologies for sending this to the wrong list. I was replying to a message on
LFS Support. I didn't check the to address before sending.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
On 12/2/05, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Why are you posting this to LFS-Dev?
Andy
Whoops. Same thing. Forgot to check the addresses in OP's message.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
I used 6.1.1 that has the patch. (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html) This patched 2 files I think, I'm at work away from the machine so I can't check for sure until later.
The normal make works fine and ld does compile and install. It's the secondary
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but that may not be suitable
if it's your first attempt at LFS. I've had good results
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:50 -0500
Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Bing. You hit the nail on the head there. As Richard said, Fedora Core 4
isn't a suitable distro to build the stable version of the book. It
should work OK for the development version but
