On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:22:53 -0800
Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To both guys,
Thanks for all the hard work on the hardware issues. I promise it is
appreciated by others on the list whether they're vocal about it or
not. I don't think I'm alone when I say that I'm eager to see how
1) I missed a bug in the package.
The order of symlinks in the rcsysinit.d directory currently is:
...
S10udev
S15udev_retry
S20swap
S30checkfs
S40mountfs
S50cleanfs
...
This completely defeats the point of the udev_retry script: to retry
RUN+=... rules that failed because /usr or /var was
Alex,
Thank you for all your input. I have updated the package with some
of your recommendations and added your name to the credits. I'm going to
try to get the input testing done today to see if it works. Will give
you feedback later.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS
To both guys,
Thanks for all the hard work on the hardware issues. I promise it is
appreciated by others on the list whether they're vocal about it or
not. I don't think I'm alone when I say that I'm eager to see how
this shakes out. Unfortunately, I know about as much about
