Dan Nicholson wrote:
Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of
stuff trying to track my work on this:
http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/
Thanks again, Dan. I've merged all recent changes from trunk into the
alphabetical branch, and I took some small
On 1/3/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For evidence, here's a diff of the build logs between iter1 and iter2 for
bison:
--- iter1/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 11:50:40.0 -0800
+++ iter2/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 13:28:54.0 -0800
@@ -79,8 +79,7 @@
checking for yywrap
On 1/4/06, Tushar Teredesai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/06, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For evidence, here's a diff of the build logs between iter1 and iter2 for
bison:
--- iter1/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29 11:50:40.0 -0800
+++ iter2/bison-2.1.log 2005-12-29
Dan Nicholson wrote:
OK, but in this case it was useful. Putting bison in Ch.5, and moving
flex before bison in Ch. 6 has cleared up the ICA differences. Later
I'll actually look at the bison source a bit to confirm this, but I'm
pretty sure there's a circular dependency here. flex uses
On 1/4/06, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you guys mind giving me a little summary of the progress of the
last week? Also, Chris, I believe you have a patch for the book, right?
Which is the current one?
Until they finally kick me off their server, I've got a little repo of
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Dan, Chris:
I see you guys have done a lot of work over the past week. Thank you
very much for that. I'm having a little trouble sorting through the
hundreds of emails in my Inbox today and pinpointing exactly what
changes are ready to go into the alpha branch.
On 1/2/06, Greg Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks pretty good. I'm pretty sure you'll find perl, vim and nscd are
different due to timestamps embedded into the binaries. You can easily
confirm this by using `strings' and `diff' eg:
strings cmp/iter1/*/nscd 1
strings cmp/iter2/*/nscd 2
On 12/23/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done an ICA/Farce report on the LFS Alphabetical branch.
OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
still causing problems. A minimal changelog of
Dan Nicholson wrote:
OK, round 2 here. I made a couple changes, some of which were just
guesses and haven't affected anything. bison, perl, vim, nscd are
still causing problems.
Looks pretty good. I'm pretty sure you'll find perl, vim and nscd are
different due to timestamps embedded into
On 12/27/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My memory is getting hazy (been a long day), but I have a suspicion
that bison might also be affected by the missing gettext.
I'm moving flex and gettext up in the build. We'll see what happens.
The big hassle is trying to make sense of
On 12/27/05, Greg Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I think you may be right about not
installing the locales for the purposes of ICA. I'm gonna change the
locale installation to check for RUN_ICA in my scripts.
Don't be too concerned with the locale-archive. It's
On 12/26/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been attempting to run an ICA on my CLFS ppc builds (CLFS from
20051214, but modified to also build a minimal 64-bit toolchain in
/opt/kgcc because the cpu is a G5). So, my observations have very
little to do with the alphabetical branch
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Did LFS use to build bison and flex in /tools?
When we used HJL binutils (before FSF binutils supported TLS/NPTL), yes.
HJL binutils require bison and flex (or at least, they used to).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
bison, perl, vim - for me, these differ between my second and third
builds, but not for my third and fourth, nor for the first and second -
I guess this is the whole point of ICA and the build will be assumed
guilty unless an explanation can be
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I haven't done any research yet, but I'm attaching the ICA report for
1v2. With the exception of farce-extras (too big to move around), you
can see the results in http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/ .
I'm going out of town in the morning, so
On 12/23/05, Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't done any research yet, but I'm attaching the ICA report for
1v2. With the exception of farce-extras (too big to move around), you
can see the results in http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/ .
One thing that looks strange.
16 matches
Mail list logo
