Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Zachary Kotlarek
On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US English" I would > actually say "maths libraries" rather than "math libraries". I've never > quite understood why Americans drop the 's'. The word being contracted is > 'mathematics' (plur

Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Jim DeMarco
Hi Matthew! Thanks for the quick reply! On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Just one minor point: > >> p. xiii: >> "This package package contains math libraries" >> should be >> "This package contains math libraries" > > Being a speaker of "British English" rather than "US

Re: LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:06:20 -0500, Jim DeMarco wrote: > Hi! > > I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like > to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They > apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some > grammar mistakes. Thanks for the

LFS 6.6-rc1 corrections

2010-02-19 Thread Jim DeMarco
Hi! I have just started reading the LFS documentation and would like to propose the following [minor] corrections to LFS 6.6-rc1. They apply to LFS-BOOK-6.6-rc1.pdf and are mostly typos and some grammar mistakes. --Jim DeMarco p. ix: "Some other facts about a 64-bit systems need to be added her