Richard A Downing wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Do you mean something like this? :)
snip a gert big script
Horrible! :-)
Seriously, I'm sure it works for you, but everyone should roll their own
(Here Richard seeks to dominate the world with his own opinion - as
usual :). I see LFS
I've become rather fond on the style shown in Bruce's SBU pages:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/about.html
it neatly gets you:
1) a log
2) the time it took recorded in the log
3) a deeper understanding of how the shell works :-)
Nice! :) Thanks!
Dave
--
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0100, Richard A Downing wrote:
My way now is never to type the commands directly, but create a
scriptlet for each package built from a template that is essentially
Bruce's script plus some checks.
And to take automation one step further, you could put
Archaic wrote these words on 08/09/05 16:04 CST:
Groovy. BTW, just taking a quick peek at my buildscript for strace (I
can't remember how long it was that I wrote it), strace is a cmmi
package.
Yes, I believe it is. But the point of this page is not so much to
provide build instructions as it
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:10:22PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Yes, I believe it is. But the point of this page is not so much to
provide build instructions as it is a place where you can find out
what is available and where the hell to download stuff from without
having to spend time
Archaic wrote these words on 08/09/05 16:14 CST:
Understood. But since the discussion of gdb instruction came up, I
thought it might be relevant to the discussion since a page for strace
would require very minimal maintenance.
Yeah, I kind of thought my message before this was rather blunt.
I
Unless you have a reason to use static libraries, I'd just move them
out of the way (after confirming exactly what it installed,
of course).
If you do have a reason to use them, rebuild *binutils* following the
chapter 6 LFS instructions.
Ok great. :) Thank you ever so much, Ken. :)
