El Martes, 5 de Julio de 2005 08:39, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> I think that the biggest trouble is that xpointer expressions include
> some meaningless offset numbers like para[2] instead of assigning a
> meaningful name to the exact text to be copied to another page.
The more simplest wa
M.Canales.es wrote:
It failed on their current form. The xpointer expesions used aren't useful for
moving targets. That is the big issue: if there is a change on the nodes
position in the target file, the xpointers that point to that file wll be
wrong.
I think that the biggest trouble is that
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 22:05, Jim Gifford escribió:
> I wouln't say it failed, I think we should just keep it architecure
> specific.
It failed on their current form. The xpointer expesions used aren't useful for
moving targets. That is the big issue: if there is a change on the nodes
pos
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 19:43, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
I'm not trying to be a stick in the mud here, and Manuel, I do
appreciate all your good work and efforts to make things more fluid, but
after trying to edit the new cross-lfs book several times and *still*
get
El Lunes, 4 de Julio de 2005 19:43, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> I'm not trying to be a stick in the mud here, and Manuel, I do
> appreciate all your good work and efforts to make things more fluid, but
> after trying to edit the new cross-lfs book several times and *still*
> getting lost and turne
Hi All,
For the record, I'd like to suggest that we remove the many extra
xi:include tags for text and commands within the cross-lfs book. Far
from simplifying the process of editing the book, IMHO, it has made it
10 times harder. I can't see a thing clearly when I go in there. It's
like a ma
