Re: [lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 12/04/2019 20:24, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:13 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev > wrote: >> >> I'm certainly interested. You can make it as a patch set, I have a private >> git >> repo where I can run "git am", which I then synchronize with the svn local >>

Re: [lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:13 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > I'm certainly interested. You can make it as a patch set, I have a private git > repo where I can run "git am", which I then synchronize with the svn local > copy, which can then be checked in svn.linuxfromscratch.org. I do

Re: [lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 12/04/2019 19:06, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:48 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev > wrote: >> >> It is certainly worth trying, but who will be able to find the time for >> doing this? I'm working steadily towards a complete jhalfs automated >> LFS/BLFS (some

Re: [lfs-dev] Mere Linux

2019-04-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:02 PM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > I've has a look at your build, and I think it solves the problems I have with > the pacman package management example in jhalfs, so a great thanks for that, > I'll try and include your method. Nice, glad it was helpful. Let

Re: [lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:48 AM Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > It is certainly worth trying, but who will be able to find the time for > doing this? I'm working steadily towards a complete jhalfs automated > LFS/BLFS (some kind of reference build), trying not to ask my fellow > editors to

Re: [lfs-dev] Mere Linux

2019-04-12 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 12/04/2019 05:49, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm just dropping a line to say I've released some actual documentation around > a system I've been tinkering with for a long time: https://merelinux.org > > I thought some of you might find some ideas and features

Re: [lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 12/04/2019 12:37, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote: On March 28, 2019 7:00:29 PM CDT, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: It is disappointing that glibc links to static libgcc.  What we really need is a new generation of experimenters to replace Greg and Ryan. I like the sound of the "very clean

Re: [lfs-dev] Mere Linux

2019-04-12 Thread DJ Lucas via lfs-dev
On April 11, 2019 10:49:07 PM CDT, Jeremy Huntwork via lfs-dev wrote: >Hi Folks, > >I'm just dropping a line to say I've released some actual documentation >around a system I've been tinkering with for a long time: >https://merelinux.org > >I thought some of you might find some ideas and

[lfs-dev] very clean method - was: Re: [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-04-12 Thread DJ Lucas via lfs-dev
On March 28, 2019 7:00:29 PM CDT, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: >It is disappointing that glibc links to static libgcc.  What we >really need is a new generation of experimenters to replace Greg and >Ryan. > >I like the sound of the "very clean method", but I'm not sure that >it helps,