Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 3/28/19 7:00 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote: Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: On

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Ken Moffat via lfs-dev
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote: > >> Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: > >>> On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 3/28/19 5:42 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote: Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 27/03/2019 16:43,

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote: >> Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: >>> On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 3/28/19 12:30 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2019-03-28 12:11 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote: The worst thing in autotools is the stupid libtool with a lot of .la files. I

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2019-03-28 12:11 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:59:38 -0500 > > > Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > > There are just too many problems

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 3/28/19 1:35 AM, James B via lfs-dev wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800 Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: Just my 2 cents. Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :). LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without problems. Autotools is definitely a

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev
On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:59:38 -0500 Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: There are just too many problems with meson-0.50.0. Therefore I have reverted to meson-0.49.2 in lfs-svn until it gets

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread James B via lfs-dev
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:09:23 +0100 thomas via lfs-dev wrote: > Am 2019-03-28 08:03, schrieb Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev: > > I build GCC with "--enable-multiarch" so Python 3 will use suffixes > > "x86_64- > > linux-gnu" and "i386-linux-gnu" to distinguish 64-bit and 32-bit > > loadable shared > >

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread thomas via lfs-dev
Am 2019-03-28 08:03, schrieb Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev: On 2019-03-28 16:35 +1000, James B wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800 Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > Just my 2 cents. > > Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :). LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote: Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote: For future reference, the

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread thomas via lfs-dev
Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev: On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote: For future reference, the 'strings' utility might be better suited for this

Re: [lfs-dev] [RFC] Use GCC -ffile-prefix-map option to simplify instruction of Glibc

2019-03-28 Thread Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: > On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: >> On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote: >> >>> For future reference, the 'strings' utility might be better suited for this >>> task, rather than opening a binary in a text

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
On 2019-03-28 16:35 +1000, James B wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800 > Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > > > Just my 2 cents. > > > > Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :). > > LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without > problems. Autotools is

Re: [lfs-dev] meson

2019-03-28 Thread James B via lfs-dev
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800 Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: > > > Just my 2 cents. > > Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :). LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without problems. Autotools is definitely a nightmare to debug, and newer versions may not