On 3/28/19 7:00 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
On
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:42:25PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
> >> Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
> >>> On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via
On 3/28/19 5:42 PM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 27/03/2019 16:43,
On 28/03/2019 11:44, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
>> Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
>>> On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On
On 3/28/19 12:30 PM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
On 2019-03-28 12:11 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote:
The worst thing in autotools is the stupid libtool with a lot of .la files.
I
On 2019-03-28 12:11 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:59:38 -0500
> > > Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are just too many problems
On 3/28/19 1:35 AM, James B via lfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800
Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
Just my 2 cents.
Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :).
LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without
problems. Autotools is definitely a
On 3/28/19 12:45 AM, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
On 2019-03-28 15:15 +1000, James B via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 21:59:38 -0500
Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
There are just too many problems with meson-0.50.0. Therefore I have
reverted to meson-0.49.2 in lfs-svn until it gets
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:09:23 +0100
thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
> Am 2019-03-28 08:03, schrieb Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev:
> > I build GCC with "--enable-multiarch" so Python 3 will use suffixes
> > "x86_64-
> > linux-gnu" and "i386-linux-gnu" to distinguish 64-bit and 32-bit
> > loadable shared
> >
Am 2019-03-28 08:03, schrieb Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev:
On 2019-03-28 16:35 +1000, James B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800
Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :).
LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't
On 28/03/2019 10:42, thomas via lfs-dev wrote:
Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
For future reference, the
Am 2019-03-28 09:57, schrieb Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev:
On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
For future reference, the 'strings' utility might be better suited
for this
On 27/03/2019 17:55, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 27/03/2019 16:43, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
>> On 3/26/19 11:51 PM, DJ Lucas via lfs-dev wrote:
>>
>>> For future reference, the 'strings' utility might be better suited for this
>>> task, rather than opening a binary in a text
On 2019-03-28 16:35 +1000, James B wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800
> Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :).
>
> LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without
> problems. Autotools is
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:45:56 +0800
Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> Also, just my 0.01 yuan (about 1/7 cents :).
LOL. I certainly agree with you that autotools and cmake aren't without
problems. Autotools is definitely a nightmare to debug, and newer versions may
not
15 matches
Mail list logo