On August 16, 2018 10:44:47 AM CDT, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > >OK, I'll release -rc2. I do not think we need to invalidate the tags >we >have already done in BLFS.
Of course, it's always a concern, but in this case I can't see anything that is made available to the dependent packages. I sure as heck don't *want* to generate more work. > For kernels 4.18 and 1.18.1 I did: > >make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install >find dest/include \( -name .install -o -name ..install.cmd \) -delete > >and then > >$ diff -Naur linux-4.18/dest linux-4.18.1/dest > >diff -Naur linux-4.18/dest/include/linux/version.h >linux-4.18.1/dest/include/linux/version.h >--- linux-4.18/dest/include/linux/version.h 2018-08-16 >10:35:06.647129120 -0500 >+++ linux-4.18.1/dest/include/linux/version.h 2018-08-16 >10:35:59.127620298 -0500 >@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ >-#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 266752 >+#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 266753 > >With that small a change, an in-place update of kernels will not change > >any other packages. > That's funny. I was referring to the OpenSSL headers. I hadn't even considered diffing the kennel headers. With the number of commits, I had assumed there were differences. Seems my second glibc rebuild was completely unnecessary (the first was, as I had completed the current build just a few hours before that last commit). -- DJ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
