is LFS LSB compliant?

2005-10-06 Thread Chakkaradeep C C
hi all, i just want to know whether LFS is LSB or FHS compliant? with regards, C.C.Chakkaradeep -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: is LFS LSB compliant?

2005-10-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Chakkaradeep C C wrote: hi all, i just want to know whether LFS is LSB or FHS compliant? with regards, C.C.Chakkaradeep FHS - maybe. If my memory is correct, the instructions for FHS compliance are in the book, but some of them might be phrased as optional. LSB -

5.7 Adjusting the Toolchain .?

2005-10-06 Thread Iman Darabi
Hi Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2. Book vresion: 6.1 As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file to point to the new dynamic linker, the /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 will replace with the /lib/ld-linux.so.2 in specs file . ok , no problem ; but I'm using lfs

Re: 5.7 Adjusting the Toolchain .?

2005-10-06 Thread Robert Russell
On 10/6/05, Iman Darabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2. Book vresion: 6.1 As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file to point to the new dynamic linker, the /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 will replace with the /lib/ld-linux.so.2

Cross-lfs-20051005-x86

2005-10-06 Thread Luca
Hi all In Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20051005-x86 in Chapter 4.5 I'm having the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ install -d $HOME/cross-tools [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ exit exit SUSE93:~ # LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'` [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ln -s $LFSHOME/cross-tools / ln: creating symbolic link

Re: Cross-lfs-20051005-x86

2005-10-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Luca wrote: Hi all In Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20051005-x86 in Chapter 4.5 I'm having the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ install -d $HOME/cross-tools [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ exit exit SUSE93:~ # LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'` [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ln -s

Re: Postfix and package users hint

2005-10-06 Thread Jason Gurtz
On 10/5/2005 15:17, Steve Prior wrote: Why the all or nothing philosophy? DJB software world in a nutshell: - Extremely secure (in default configuration) - Good performance - Very little features (probably missing the one you need) - Patches to add missing features are of varying quality

re-entering chroot correctly

2005-10-06 Thread Albert
Sorry to bother everyone with this again, but I am on my third host and have lost a lot of email in the process. Could someone please verify that the commands below are the correct way to re-enter chroot, chptr 6, after rebooting host: export LFS=/mnt/hda6.lfs61 # 6.2. Mounting Virtual

Re: Postfix and package users hint

2005-10-06 Thread Richard A Downing
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote: A question for the package users users out there. Anyone using postfix as their MTA? This thread seems to have dissolved into 'recommend an MTA'. I'd recommend XMail. It's easy to build, easy to configure, has a built in pop3 server, integrates well with clamav or

Re: Step 6.11 - Glibc - tst-rwlock6 error

2005-10-06 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 10/5/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to google AND check the LFS site to see if this is something I should be concerned about, but I can't find anything. What is timeout too short? Does this mean it timed out (something that the LFS book said may happen on older

Re: 5.7 Adjusting the Toolchain .?

2005-10-06 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Iman Darabi wrote: On 10/6/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Iman Darabi wrote: Hi Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2. Book vresion: 6.1 As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file to point to the new dynamic

Glibc pass1 compilation hangs

2005-10-06 Thread Serge
Hi could you please help me... I started to compile LFS 6.1 on my computer with celeron-676MHz 128Mb with Mandrake 10 installed as a host system. So, following the book, I compiled binutils and gcc without major problems. Now, when I try to compile glibc-2.3.4 pass 1 compilation process

Re: Step 6.11 - Glibc - tst-rwlock6 error

2005-10-06 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 10/6/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... That's a possibility, as I am running NTP. Here's what I did, though: - I created a new build directory - glibc2-build - As I already applied the patch in the source, I didn't do it again - I ran the configure - I ran the make -

Re: Step 6.11 - Glibc - tst-rwlock6 error

2005-10-06 Thread Jon Fullmer
I'm sorry, I didn't mention that, did I? I did NOT disable NTP at any time. I made no changes to the system. I followed the procedure that I outlined only. - Jon on 10/6/05 6:14 PM, Dan Nicholson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/6/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... That's a

Re: Step 6.11 - Glibc - tst-rwlock6 error

2005-10-06 Thread Jon Fullmer
Not to beat a tired point, but the more I think about it, the more this could easily be related to NTP. It would seem that the glibc tests are based on the clock it keeps within itself, but also somewhat upon system time. If NTP were to do a time adjustment during the test (even a slight one),