hi all,
i just want to know whether LFS is LSB or FHS compliant?
with regards,
C.C.Chakkaradeep
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
hi all,
i just want to know whether LFS is LSB or FHS compliant?
with regards,
C.C.Chakkaradeep
FHS - maybe. If my memory is correct, the instructions for FHS
compliance are in the book, but some of them might be phrased as
optional.
LSB -
Hi
Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2.
Book vresion: 6.1
As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file
to point to the new dynamic linker, the /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 will
replace with the /lib/ld-linux.so.2 in specs file .
ok , no problem ; but I'm using lfs
On 10/6/05, Iman Darabi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2.
Book vresion: 6.1
As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file
to point to the new dynamic linker, the /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 will
replace with the /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Hi all
In Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20051005-x86 in Chapter 4.5 I'm having the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ install -d $HOME/cross-tools
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ exit
exit
SUSE93:~ # LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'`
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ln -s $LFSHOME/cross-tools /
ln: creating symbolic link
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Luca wrote:
Hi all
In Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20051005-x86 in Chapter 4.5 I'm having the following
error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ install -d $HOME/cross-tools
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ exit
exit
SUSE93:~ # LFSHOME=`su - lfs -c 'echo $HOME'`
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ln -s
On 10/5/2005 15:17, Steve Prior wrote:
Why the all or nothing philosophy?
DJB software world in a nutshell:
- Extremely secure (in default configuration)
- Good performance
- Very little features (probably missing the one you need)
- Patches to add missing features are of varying quality
Sorry to bother everyone with this again, but I am on my third host and
have lost a lot of email in the process. Could someone please verify
that the commands below are the correct way to re-enter chroot, chptr 6,
after rebooting host:
export LFS=/mnt/hda6.lfs61
# 6.2. Mounting Virtual
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
A question for the package users users out there. Anyone using
postfix as their MTA?
This thread seems to have dissolved into 'recommend an MTA'. I'd
recommend XMail. It's easy to build, easy to configure, has a built in
pop3 server, integrates well with clamav or
On 10/5/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to google AND check the LFS site to see if this is something I
should be concerned about, but I can't find anything. What is timeout too
short? Does this mean it timed out (something that the LFS book said may
happen on older
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Iman Darabi wrote:
On 10/6/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Iman Darabi wrote:
Hi
Host System : lfs live cd version:x86-6.1-2.
Book vresion: 6.1
As you know : after using the sed script to amend the GCC specs file
to point to the new dynamic
Hi
could you please help me...
I started to compile LFS 6.1 on my computer with celeron-676MHz 128Mb
with Mandrake 10 installed as a host system.
So, following the book, I compiled binutils and gcc without major problems.
Now, when I try to compile glibc-2.3.4 pass 1 compilation process
On 10/6/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... That's a possibility, as I am running NTP. Here's what I did,
though:
- I created a new build directory - glibc2-build
- As I already applied the patch in the source, I didn't do it again
- I ran the configure
- I ran the make
-
I'm sorry, I didn't mention that, did I? I did NOT disable NTP at any time.
I made no changes to the system. I followed the procedure that I outlined
only.
- Jon
on 10/6/05 6:14 PM, Dan Nicholson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/05, Jon Fullmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... That's a
Not to beat a tired point, but the more I think about it, the more this
could easily be related to NTP. It would seem that the glibc tests are
based on the clock it keeps within itself, but also somewhat upon system
time. If NTP were to do a time adjustment during the test (even a slight
one),
15 matches
Mail list logo