Hallo everybody!
Who can give me a hint about documentation
about the Subject:
Kind regards
Clemens
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
man bash
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
LFS 6.1.1
Here is the error after running make make[3]: Entering directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/lfs-packages-6.1.1/binutils-build/binutils'
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -o size size.o bucomm.o version.o
filemode.o ../bfd/libbfd.la
Clemens Haupt wrote:
Hallo everybody!
Who can give me a hint about documentation
about the Subject:
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=bash+ps1
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
A. J. Shirey wrote:
/mnt/lfs/sources/lfs-packages-6.1.1/binutils-build/binutils/../../binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2/binutils/arlex.l:
In function ‘yylex’:
Have you installed flex and bison?
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Andrew Benton wrote these words on 01/22/06 07:53 CST:
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=bash+ps1
This is great. :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
08:19:00 up 119
Clemens Haupt wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 12:30, you wrote:
man bash
Danke!
When the lfs partition is mounted, all ln -s are here again
Where is that stored?
Kind regards
Clemens
I don't know what you mean. Where is what stored?
--
im installing LFS from Nalfs I see there isnt a XML page for this I know a
little about XML but I dont know how to implement XML through these commands:
mv man/de{_DE.88591,}
mv man/es{_ES.88591,}
mv man/it{_IT.88591,}
mv man/ja{_JP.eucJP,}
sed -i 's,\*_\*,??,' man/Makefile.in
--
Ok, my host is Knoppix 4.0.2 using kernel 2.6.9.
The Util-linux dialog looks like this (the haves are
excluded)
.
.
.
you don't have uuid/uuid.h
you don't have termcap
.
.
you need -lcrypt
.
.
you don't have zlib
you don't have blkid
During ch. 5.33 Stripping I recieved this error
strip:
--- Julio Meca Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At ch. 6.37.1 Installation of Bash the command
reads:
tar -xvf ../bash-doc-3.0.tar.gz
The 6.1.1 lfs-packages has a bash-doc-3.0.tar.bz2
file.
no real difference, just a different compression
method, anyway, seems
that's a character
i'd already came to this stage untaring the glibc once again as follows:
I have no name!://sources# tar -xvf glibc-2.3.4.tat.bz2
cd into the new glibc source directory and did the 3 patches, mkdir
../glibc-build.
cd ../glibc-build
then in ...glibc-build#
../configure with options according to
mrdaniel wrote:
i'd already came to this stage untaring the glibc once again as follows:
I have no name!://sources# tar -xvf glibc-2.3.4.tat.bz2
cd into the new glibc source directory and did the 3 patches, mkdir ../glibc-build.
cd ../glibc-build
then in ...glibc-build#
../configure with
hi chris,
wow, you are sharp, looking back at my log book i could have missed that line
on pg 81 :-
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h
but how do i get out of chroot, there is no command when i used su and others
like less as well.
yuu ask me to paste the output here and what do you meant. if
hi chris,
found the command to exit chroot and in lfs did ldd /tools/bin/gcc the result
is :-
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 =- /lib/llibc.co.6 (0xb7efd000)
/lib/ld-llinux.so.2 (0xb7fee000)
thanks.
--- mrdaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi chris,
wow, you are sharp, looking
mrdaniel wrote:
hi chris,
found the command to exit chroot and in lfs did ldd /tools/bin/gcc the result
is :-
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 =- /lib/llibc.co.6 (0xb7efd000)
/lib/ld-llinux.so.2 (0xb7fee000)
thanks.
--- mrdaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi chris,
wow, you are
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/22/06 22:44 CST:
[snip many, many lines]
There's the problem. Your gcc is linked against the host's libraries.
You likely missed a step in the toolchain adjustment, or the gcc specs
patch. You need to start the whole build over.
Chris, could you attempt
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/22/06 22:44 CST:
[snip many, many lines]
There's the problem. Your gcc is linked against the host's libraries.
You likely missed a step in the toolchain adjustment, or the gcc specs
patch. You need to start the whole build over.
this time i had removed all preciding message so no top-posting. i hope its the
way to be.
BTW chris advise to start all over, but from ch6 or all the way back to ch1.
if re-do before entering ch 6, is there any clean up needed and if so how.
thanks
--
mrdaniel wrote:
hi chris,
to start all over i will, but may i be advised at which point to apply the
ldd and what to expect. That should be helpful to all as well i suppose.
thanks.
You simply make sure you follow all of the book's instructions,
especially the toolchain sanity checks.
--
mrdaniel wrote:
chris,
but it passed the sanity check. the message was diaplayed after the readelf ... command as:
[requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
thus it seemed that all was well up to that point.
your advise please.
thanks
It doesn't matter...gcc itself is
On 1/22/06, mrdaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it passed the sanity check. the message was diaplayed after the readelf
... command as:
[requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
2 points:
1. Please don't top-post. See how what you have written is above
what I have
At ch. 6.37.1, when I enter the command:
exec /bin/bash --login +h
I get the following responce:
Vim: Caught deadly signal TERM
Vim: Finished.
This could be a glitch in the new kernel, re-entering
the command works.
The rest of the build has gone smoothly. An excellent
book.
22 matches
Mail list logo
