ForrestG wrote:
I have 256MB ram but motherboard detect only 128MB
Well, that looks like a problem, but it doesn't
look like the cause of your boot failure.
The error report looks like you are using too much stack. If
so, then the problem is not insufficient RAM. Unless you
use a RAM disc, and
First, I want to thank everyone involved in creating the LFS project.
It is a beautiful piece of software craftsmanship -- useful, elegant
and well documented.
I'm writing this post because I have a suggestion for the Live CD part
of the LFS project. I went back and read the Live CD mailing list
Sorry this is longish, but I didn't want to post piecemeal
as I went, with this failed and what I did, then later
oh, this failed, too etc. Too much clutter.
Well, I have fiddled this and that, and somewhat gotten JHALFS
to work with the LiveCd as the host distribution. The first
hurdle is that
LFS Chapter 5.34 advises
## The commands in the remainder of this book
##must be performed while logged in as user root
## and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check
## that $LFS is set in root's environment.
The orthodox Ubuntu way of acting as root is to prepend
'sudo' to each command.
On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:19:56 stencil wrote:
Which is the better choice, -i or -s? And if it is to be
-i, is the LFS 4.4 procedure the best way of ensuring that
$LFS is set to /mnt/lfs, or should the $LFS specification be
the *only* change made to root's native environment?
I don't
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 02:09:51PM -0600, Trent Shea wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:19:56 stencil wrote:
Which is the better choice, -i or -s? And if it is to be
-i, is the LFS 4.4 procedure the best way of ensuring that
$LFS is set to /mnt/lfs, or should the $LFS specification be
