Baho Utot wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 07:36 -0500, William Immendorf wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
>>> scripts/unifdef.c:209: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
>>> /usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of 'getline' was
>> Hmm... same issue as men
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 07:36 -0500, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> > scripts/unifdef.c:209: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
> > /usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of 'getline' was
> Hmm... same issue as mentioned a month ago. U
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Baho Utot wrote:
> scripts/unifdef.c:209: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
> /usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of 'getline' was
Hmm... same issue as mentioned a month ago. Use the patch mentioned at
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-
I am getting the following error
lfs:~/linux-2.6.27.4$ make headers_check
CHK include/linux/version.h
UPD include/linux/version.h
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'traps':
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:377: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer
will brea
RaptorX wrote:
[in answer to my reply]
> while I do agree with you that there will be loads of users hanging around
> there is no security hole as far as I read... from the hint:
I tried to answer your question *as asked*, which was "Why don't
standard distros use this method?" I answered that i
