Re: building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-14 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:54:49 +0100 >Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > > [snip] > > If you opt for a 64-bit only, however, the stock LFS commands should > do the trick (I myself use ones from CLFS-1.0.0-x86_64-64, adapted > for my versions of packages/patches). > > [snip] > > Hope I was helpful. :) >

Re: building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-14 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
First off, I understand that in newer versions of LFS book, the build process changed, so that GCC and binutils are built together. I still use the old method, in which binutils and GCC are build separately. This is reflected in this e-mail, so don't let that confuse you. >On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:5

Re: building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Lapohos Tibor wrote: > Hello All, > > I the the 6.4 book thourgh, and it worked out very nicely. Now I need > a 64 bit version. I am aware that the support for 64 bit systems is > only about to come in a future release of LFS, but I would like to > give it a shot somehow, since that is what I need

building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-14 Thread Lapohos Tibor
Hello All,   I the the 6.4 book thourgh, and it worked out very nicely. Now I need a 64 bit version. I am aware that the support for 64 bit systems is only about to come in a future release of LFS, but I would like to give it a shot somehow, since that is what I need. In order to do this, one ne