Re: LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu

2009-11-17 Thread knothead00
yup. that worked ..thanks On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote: On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 22:52 -0500, Chris Staub wrote: On 11/16/2009 10:30 PM, knothea...@gmail.com wrote: When i include the line LFS_TGT=$(uname -m)-lfs-linux-gnu in the .bashrc and run the

/tools/bin/env does not exist

2009-11-17 Thread pieter blomme
Hi, Re-ran the whole LFS 6.5 book because I had a serious system crash in the middle of building a package. I reformatted the whole partition and started all over. Passed chapter 5 without any errors. But then I started chapter 6 and tried to enter chroot which gave me:

Re: /tools/bin/env does not exist

2009-11-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
pieter blomme wrote: Hi, Re-ran the whole LFS 6.5 book because I had a serious system crash in the middle of building a package. I reformatted the whole partition and started all over. Passed chapter 5 without any errors. But then I started chapter 6 and tried to enter chroot which gave

Re: /tools/bin/env does not exist

2009-11-17 Thread Randy McMurchy
pieter blomme wrote these words on 11/17/09 10:25 CST: pie...@pluto:/mnt/lfs$ sudo chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i \ HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \ PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \ /tools/bin/bash --login +h chroot: cannot run command `/tools/bin/env': No

Re: building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-17 Thread Lapohos Tibor
Thank you Bruce, Aleksandar. Sorry for the late reply, I thought I would get individual messages back to my inbox. Now I know they come back bundled up in Digests (can I change this in any way?)   1) For now, I am booting off the x86_64 lsflivecd, and I am following the CLFS way to build a

Re: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready

2009-11-17 Thread Michael
Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 18:49:26 schrieben Sie: Hello! Many thanks to all the replyers! I'd like to fix that being late of the network card/driver instead of doing some workarounds if somehow possible. There is no fix. Some cards are affected others are not. My best guess it is a

Re: building x86_64 using lsflivecd-86_64

2009-11-17 Thread Mike McCarty
Lapohos Tibor wrote: [...] Bruce wrote: Yes, you are wrong. The reason for the cross compile is to completely isolate the current host from the new system. OK, but is that not what we do in the LFS 6.4 or 6.5 as well? I am not trying to argue, just to better understand. In both LFS

Re: Problem on Gcc(Passs 2) compilation!

2009-11-17 Thread Karl Cardoso
I start again from the beginning and I get it. Sorry for my wrong. Thanks for attention! 2009/11/17 Karl Cardoso k...@karlbr.com Hi! I get this problem when a run make on the GCC (Pass 2) compilation. I'm reading the book 6.5 Problem: cp/cp-lang.o stub-objc.o cp/call.o