Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

David Expósito wrote: > I have already compiled by the lfs 6.3 and wanted to install the graphical > environment and end enterder a little more and then enpezar with the 6.6 but This looks like automatic translation with some misspelled words. <> = <> = "understand" <> = <> == "begin" > first I

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 6/1/10, Baho Utot wrote: >> >> Volunteers welcomed. > > I'll volunteer...I can mess up anything :) > I am going to try it again as I am a gluten for punishment. > >From one punishment lubber 't another: Consider using the HSR that are now in LFS-DEV for your testing. The reason I say so, is

Re: What about LFS for Alpha?

Its probably been 6 years since I built lfs on my alpha, and I have not kept it up to date, but when I built it, there were no special packages for alpha except milo and aboot. The only differences I recall were in the building of gcc and glibc, (you were just telling them to build for a differe

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 06/01/10 19:05, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > >> The system I am using to compile this stuff is an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 >> 810 Processor that has 8G DDR3 memory. I use that system so I can make >> mistakes really fast ;) ie things can go sour quickly and at a high rate >> of speed. Yo

Re: New LFS & business plan

Mike McCarty wrote: >> time -- 2.5 - 3 days (being generous here) > > I think you are being optimistic, for the first build, anyway. > I'd put in 5 days for getting the first build up and running. This all depends on experience. Actually I think there is a sweet spot. Too much experience and

Re: New LFS & business plan

George wrote: [...] > phase 2 -- building the system > > During this phase you would actually build the system as described > in the LFS and BLFS books. The time that it would take to do > this is dependent on the speed of your build-host as well as how much > you are building. For me I

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

Baho Utot wrote: > The system I am using to compile this stuff is an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 > 810 Processor that has 8G DDR3 memory. I use that system so I can make > mistakes really fast ;) ie things can go sour quickly and at a high rate > of speed. You usually don't get a chance to see them l

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 06/01/10 18:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: >> On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Paul Rogers wrote: >>> As seems indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions specif

Re: What about LFS for Alpha?

On 1 June 2010 23:04, Rafael Ruiz wrote: > Thanks ken. > But where I can find book and packages? These must be in anywhere. > Kelledin appears to have dropped off the net, so no idea. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

Baho Utot wrote: > On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Paul Rogers wrote: >> >>> As seems >>> indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and >>> have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions >>> specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Paul Rogers wrote: > >> As seems >> indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and >> have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions >> specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact >> in

Re: What about LFS for Alpha?

Thanks ken. But where I can find book and packages? These must be in anywhere. Best, Rafa 2010/6/1 Ken Moffat > On 1 June 2010 21:51, Rafael Ruiz wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin, > but > > there nothing. > > > > Best, > > Rafa >

Re: What about LFS for Alpha?

On 1 June 2010 21:51, Rafael Ruiz wrote: > > Hi all. > What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin, but > there nothing. > > Best, > Rafa > Nobody has the hardware. Also, from what I can gather (particularly my experience at clfs), building on it is very slow. There

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 1 June 2010 19:40, Paul Rogers wrote: > > As Ken wrote and I believe, most of your development team can be > expected to stay pretty close to "front-line developments."  As seems > indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and > have one system that trails, i.e. has ex

What about LFS for Alpha?

Hi all. What happen with LFS for Alpha (not CLFS). I have try to find Kedellin, but there nothing. Best, Rafa -- Registered Linux User #471869 -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information p

Re: Gnome desktop: unreadable characters

>On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:21:10 +0200 >Tobias Vogel wrote: > > hi, > > thanks for your quick reply. i checked the fonts-paths and could not > find anything odd about it, neither did the xorg.0.log complain about > anything in combination with fonts. > i ended up in reinstalling freetype2 and font

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

>> The Host System requirements may indeed be too low for LFS 6.6 Updated to the packages in LFS-6.3, known to work for LFS-6.6 Added erratum to website. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See t

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

Paul Rogers wrote: > As seems > indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and > have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions > specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact > install flawlessly with those prerequisites.

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

> "Your distro, your rules" - but going along with that, there's the > unstated "your rules, your problems". There's nothing wrong with > exploring uncharted waters, but if you sail into the middle of "here be > dragons", you can't expect to stop and ask for directions... There was a guy chained t

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

> Others have said it: unless we can duplicate the problem somebody > faces doing things slightly different, support can be hard to provide. As Ken wrote and I believe, most of your development team can be expected to stay pretty close to "front-line developments." As seems indicated by the curre

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

forgiveness and I noticed. thanks 2010/6/1 David Expósito > ok > > 2010/6/1 Bruce Dubbs > > David Expósito wrote: >> > Hello >> > >> > I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window >> environment >> > Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment >> >> There is a separate lis

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

ok 2010/6/1 Bruce Dubbs > David Expósito wrote: > > Hello > > > > I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window > environment > > Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment > > There is a separate list for blfs-support. Please use that for non-lfs > issues. > > -- Bruce

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

David Expósito wrote: > Hello > > I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment > Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment There is a separate list for blfs-support. Please use that for non-lfs issues. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

On 6/1/10, David Expósito wrote: > /usr/lib/libXfont.so: undefined reference to `ft_isdigit' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status "In newer versions of Freetype2, the ft_isdigit macro has been removed." When building libXfont-1.2.8 in ch. 23.8 Xorg-Libraries you were supposed to do: sed -i 's/(

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

I have already compiled by the lfs 6.3 and wanted to install the graphical environment and end enterder a little more and then enpezar with the 6.6 but first I want to end this. thanks 2010/6/1 Ken Moffat > On 1 June 2010 17:45, David Expósito wrote: > > Hello > > > > I wonder if anyone has c

Re: Gnome desktop: unreadable characters

hi, thanks for your quick reply. i checked the fonts-paths and could not find anything odd about it, neither did the xorg.0.log complain about anything in combination with fonts. i ended up in reinstalling freetype2 and fontconfig, what finally solved the problem, although i have no explanation

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

forgives are these: make[4]: se sale del directorio `/xc/xorg-server-1.2.0/hw/xfree86/doc' make[4]: se ingresa al directorio `/xc/xorg-server-1.2.0/hw/xfree86' /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -DHAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H -DXF86PM -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototy

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

On 1 June 2010 17:45, David Expósito wrote: > Hello > >  I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment > Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment > > The xorg-server-1.2.0 in the make I get an erro

Re: Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:45 AM, David Expósito wrote: > Hello > >  I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment > Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment > > The xorg-server-1.2.0 in the make I

Blfs X-Window (lfs scratch 6.3)

Hello I wonder if anyone has compiled lfs-scratch 6.3, the X-window environment Section 23 of BLFS. X Window System Environment The xorg-server-1.2.0 in the make I get an error: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status, make [4] *** [X

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On 01/06/10 01:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44129 > > Many Bothans died to bring us this information. LOL Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above inf

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 19:11 -0400, x2...@lycos.com wrote: > So Paul, what i really need to say is "that if it breaks, you get to > keep the pieces" but maybe, more important, "if it doesn't break, > you still get to keep the pieces". Well yes, that's true. But then, LFS is a natural path for

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 09:35 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 00:36 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > What you are overlooking is that "doing it my way" comes with "when > > it breaks, I get to keep all the pieces". > > What a curious thing to write in a SUPPORT forum of a LINUX distr