udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread robert
just did the build at host level: works fine. any suggestions? [X] make check make --no-print-directory check-recursive Making check in . make --no-print-directory libudev/test-libudev udev/test-udev CC libudev/test-libudev.o CCLD libudev/test-libudev CC udev/test-udev.o

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Neal Murphy
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote: unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2 cd udev-161 then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and not jxvf??? 'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar). 'tar xvfj' unpacks a bz2-compressed archive (.tar.bz2). 'tar xvfz'

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread robert
Neal Murphy wrote: On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote: unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2 cd udev-161 then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and not jxvf??? 'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar). 'tar xvfj' unpacks a bz2-compressed archive

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread robert
Mike Hollis wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:55:43AM -0600, robert wrote: Mike H.- jumped back out to root user asserted root:root for /tools (verified) still at root: copy and paste everything from 6.2 thru 6.6 now in chroot ... move over to 6.59 and ... unpacked

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
robert wrote: Neal Murphy wrote: On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote: unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2 cd udev-161 then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and not jxvf??? 'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar). 'tar xvfj' unpacks a

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread robert
Bruce Dubbs wrote: robert wrote: Neal Murphy wrote: On Tuesday 07 December 2010 04:55:43 robert wrote: unpacked udev-161.tar.bz2 cd udev-161 then copy and paste ... (the two dearchive operations are xvf??? and not jxvf??? 'tar xvf' unpacks a noncompressed tar archvie (.tar). 'tar xvfj'

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Neal Murphy
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 14:53:10 Bruce Dubbs wrote: When extracting, GNU tar is smart enough to recognize the compression type, if any, without being told. This capability has been in place for several years. Learn something new every day! I've been using the specific option for so long,

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote: On Tuesday 07 December 2010 14:53:10 Bruce Dubbs wrote: When extracting, GNU tar is smart enough to recognize the compression type, if any, without being told.  This capability has been in place for several years.

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote: So, I don't follow then. Instructions at 6.59. Udev-161 say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ... why not *J*xvf? Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is not 'j'. I assume you wrote it as a

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread robert
Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote: So, I don't follow then. Instructions at 6.59. Udev-161 say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ... why not *J*xvf? Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is not 'j'. I assume you

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:13:19PM -0600, robert wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is not 'j'. I assume you wrote it as a capital for more emphasis, but with the last two or three releases of tar 'J' is used for xz compression

Re: udev problem

2010-12-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
robert wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:36:31PM -0600, robert wrote: So, I don't follow then. Instructions at 6.59. Udev-161 say: tar -xvf ../udev-config-20100128.tar.bz2 ... why not *J*xvf? Apart from the other responses, I can't help commenting that 'J' is not 'j'.