[lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain Technical Notes: Doubt

2012-07-16 Thread Emerson Yesupatham
Hi, I am following Book 7.0. In Section 5.2 Toolchain Technical Notes, the following is mentioned: Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, /tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools in one location are hard linked to the other. /tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin should be

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain Technical Notes: Doubt

2012-07-16 Thread Eleanore Boyd
On 7/16/2012 9:10 AM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote: Hi, I am following Book 7.0. In Section 5.2 Toolchain Technical Notes, the following is mentioned: Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, /tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools in one location are hard linked to

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain Technical Notes: Doubt

2012-07-16 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:23:13AM -0500, Eleanore Boyd wrote: On 7/16/2012 9:10 AM, Emerson Yesupatham wrote: Binutils installs its assembler and linker in two locations, /tools/bin and /tools/$LFS_TGT/bin. The tools in one location are hard linked to the other. /tools/bin and

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain Technical Notes: Doubt

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Eleanore Boyd wrote: The compilation process creates the hard links, so there is no need to manually create links. Correct. If anything, creating links beforehand may cause errors due to the links pointing nowhere. LOL. You can't create a hard link that points to nowhere. You could

Re: [blfs-support] Invitation to use Google Talk

2012-07-16 Thread Ronnie van Aarle
No problem, just too bad I can't read your profile. 2012/7/16 Yongbiao Long longyongb...@gmail.com I feel terribly sorry for mis press the 'invite to chat' buttom! -- Best Regards -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOk-7.0:Section:5.2 Tool Chain Technical Notes: Doubt

2012-07-16 Thread Baho Utot
On 07/16/2012 11:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Eleanore Boyd wrote: The compilation process creates the hard links, so there is no need to manually create links. Correct. If anything, creating links beforehand may cause errors due to the links pointing nowhere. LOL. You can't create a hard

Re: [lfs-support] Hard links

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Baho Utot wrote: One could do this echo test file test ln test link1 ln test link2 ln link1 link3 ls -i 1333952 test 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3 rm test ls -i 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3 Doesn't link[1..3] point to no where or garbage? No, they point

Re: [lfs-support] Hard links

2012-07-16 Thread Baho Utot
On Monday, July 16, 2012 08:09:23 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: One could do this echo test file test ln test link1 ln test link2 ln link1 link3 ls -i 1333952 test 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3 rm test ls -i 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952

Re: [lfs-support] Hard links

2012-07-16 Thread Fernando de Oliveira
Em 16-07-2012 21:20, Baho Utot escreveu: On Monday, July 16, 2012 08:09:23 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: One could do this echo test file test ln test link1 ln test link2 ln link1 link3 ls -i 1333952 test 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3 rm test ls -i 1333952

Re: [lfs-support] Hard links

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Baho Utot wrote: On Monday, July 16, 2012 08:09:23 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: Baho Utot wrote: One could do this echo test file test ln test link1 ln test link2 ln link1 link3 ls -i 1333952 test 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3 rm test ls -i 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952