stosss wrote:
> I think something got overlooked. It doesn't effect the build process.
> I believe this should be 8.6 ?
>
> LFS 7.3
>
> 5.10.2. Contents of Tcl
> Installed programs: tclsh (link to tclsh8.5) and tclsh8.5
> Installed library: libtcl8.5.so, libtclstub8.5.a
There is nothing like a new
Keith:
The first ln command that Bruce provided you, works just fine if
you're under the /bin directory.
Then he corrected himself by giving you a flawless command which
works, no matter where you stand on your file system.
The intention of the list is to help users with LFS, not to prove
their ex
On 03/03/2013 02:36 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 03/01/2013 08:15 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>> FYI - For those that may be interested.
>>
>> I have just finished my current project, building LFS using the RPM
>> package manager.
>> It builds the LFS tool chain from bash scripts, then RPM is build and
>>
Like this:
ln -sfn bash /bin/sh
As you got it wrong the first try:)
Thanks for the help though!
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Keith Clark wrote:
> >> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
> >>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
> On
Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 03:57 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 20:31, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> Has anyone success
Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 03:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in
On 03/03/13 20:58, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 03:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past the 5.5 GCC section.
On 13-03-03 03:57 PM, spiky wrote:
> On 03/03/13 20:31, Keith Clark wrote:
>> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
>>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS usi
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Keith Clark wrote:
>> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
>>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I
>> cannot
>
Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past the 5.5 GCC section
On 03/03/13 20:55, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:54 PM, Armin K. wrote:
>> On 03/03/2013 08:51 PM, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Keith Clark
wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>
On 13-03-03 03:05 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Keith Clark wrote:
>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
On 03/03/13 20:31, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past
On 13-03-03 02:54 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 03/03/2013 08:51 PM, Keith Clark wrote:
>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an er
On 13-03-03 02:57 PM, Denis Mugnier wrote:
> On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
>> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an er
Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>>> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
>>> tried.
>> Maybe post the output of the version-
On 03/03/13 20:51, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>>> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
>>> tried.
>> Maybe post the out
On 03/03/13 19:51, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>>> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
>>> tried.
>> Maybe post the out
On 03/03/2013 08:51 PM, Keith Clark wrote:
> On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
>> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>>> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
>>> tried.
>> Maybe post th
On 13-03-03 02:37 PM, spiky wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
>> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
>> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
>> tried.
> Maybe post the output of the version-script
version-check.sh ou
I have just finished the latest LFS, and it is working great !
I like to work from my desktop computer (with Windows 7, still .) in a
terminal emulator, so for me Open-SSH and wget was imperative. Those two I
installed per BLFS, and they too worked very well and without problems.
I just wan
Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
> tried.
Check your executable versions in the Preface, Section vii.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 03/03/13 19:36, Keith Clark wrote:
> Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
> get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
> tried.
Maybe post the output of the version-script
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
Has anyone successfully completed the LFS using Ubuntu 12.10? I cannot
get past the 5.5 GCC section. Always ends up in an error. Three times
tried.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informati
On 03/01/2013 08:15 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> FYI - For those that may be interested.
>
> I have just finished my current project, building LFS using the RPM
> package manager.
> It builds the LFS tool chain from bash scripts, then RPM is build and
> installed into /tools,
> which I then use to bu
arad...@juno.com wrote:
> Just doing some double-checking after building LFS 7.3. Could not find
> libmp{a.so} on the system.
>
> I remember all 184 GMP tests passing.
>
> I read and searched NEWS and CHANGELOG in the build directory and saw some
> indirect indications that maybe libmp has been r
Just doing some double-checking after building LFS 7.3. Could not find
libmp{a.so} on the system.
I remember all 184 GMP tests passing.
I read and searched NEWS and CHANGELOG in the build directory and saw some
indirect indications that maybe libmp has been removed recently.
The Makefile comme
28 matches
Mail list logo
