On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 21:02 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
Declan Moriarty wrote:
There are two modes of SELinux, the full monty and a 'targeted' mode. By
default distros are using the targeted mode, which targets a number of
server daemons, including syslogd.
You might be able to turn
and that works
--
With Best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw 0 0
proc /lfs6/proc proc rw,nodiratime 0 0
sysfs /lfs6/sys sysfs rw 0 0
so I'm getting some options carried over into the LFS environment.
Any ideas?
--
With Best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
of this.
2. I'll ask elsewhere, and maybe get a way out.
3. hlfs just may work for me, as I have the static compiler from ch. 5.
I don't look forward to meeting pax or grsecurity there.
4. How much ram do you need for the livecd approach?
--
With Best Regards,
Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
| Hi folks,
| i've above error on boot every time (seems) a device try loading.
| It says also 'report this error to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
| Of course
word wrap my
mails, but people are more tolerant these days.
BTW, stop compiling until you are sure of your memory. You may decide
down the road it all has to be done again...
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ
, the problem was not running ldconfig, right?
Rerun ldconfig like you might have run lilo. It's fast, easy painless
and you sure suffer if you don't
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http
in the adduser command allows you to limit the user. A
homedir of /dev/null means he can't write. The shell is another, as is
the group
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
:-)
and don't reply to an ongoing one.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
?
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
).
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
out that business of hotplug insisting on giving me
a usb-2.0 module which sent the usb here jamming syslog. I used a
workaround
rm -f /lib/modules/2.5.12.1-0705/kernel/drivers/usb/host/ehci_hcd.ko :-D
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
the dialogue thusly
gs myfile.ps gs.err 21
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
on a port is not necessarily connected, or
routed, just listening. Why should netstat list it?
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
and it will spew messages about gs-8.x
checking all these directories, finding fonts and vetting them. Put a
GS_FONTPATH in /etc/profile.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Declan Moriarty wrote:
On the basis that udev-059 should have improved things, (but didn't);
udev-060 should have fixed that (but didn't); So udev-061 must work...
And our survey saidpossibly not :) Try udev-062!
Too late... Udev-058
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
Declan Moriarty wrote:
[ -f /dev/.udev.tdb ] exit 0
This is a check for udev _already_ being started
Huh? Does the script still really contain this? If you are using a
journaled FS mounted read-write at boot, this bug happens
only takes 68k!
What's the beef? The only logging at that stage is dmesg, and it shows
nothing.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
outpacing you , stop it
temporarily. Google for references on dual port cards. Have you ethernet
bridging enabled in the kernel (says he, not knowing too much about
this).
BTW, have you read Documentation/networking/e1000.txt in the kernel
source?
--
With best Regards,
Declan
on a 2.4x kernel, but that's not your fault...
TIA
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:35 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
Useful to know. So the /dev/input thing is simply specifying the
protocol, and the device node can vary.
As I understand it, the kernel provides a standard input framework,
where any
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:43:49PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
Should I choose a 2.6 kernel, the loadkeys script doesn't start, and
I get this curious messing with no cursor.
To me it smells like a framebuffer issue. Ok, here is (almost
get the 80x25 screen. No framebuffer present
in either, AFAIK.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:35:35PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:02:55PM -0300, Hugo Bernier wrote:
I think that instructions to setup spam filters for a wide
.
anyhostname.correct.domain passes this test. Maybe tell postfix to
identify as uu.net? Any dns check will check 149.225.156.186 which
resolves to uu.net anyhow.
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
http://www.tv3.ie
I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they?
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
have to send an extremely complex set of
options, change the $PATH, LIBDIR, INCLUDEDIR, and a few other things,
but could he do it then?
--
With best Regards,
Declan Moriarty.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs
Available time? What's that?
Cheers.
--
Tony
It's what none of us guys who spend hours writing e-mail at each other
say we have :-/.
I'm giving a 15 minute talk tomorrow to the congregation (I'm a J.W.
elder) on the evils of the Inetrnet, and specifically the way people
can waste time that
On 4/14/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Declan Moriarty wrote:
did you intend to send an off-list reply, the question you ask sounds as
if it's aimed generally ?
Nope - something stupid. It's got to do with rushing and web mail.
On 4/14/05, Ken Moffat [EMAIL
All this from 5 months ago.
I was having problems with cursors on tty2 -- and the 2.6 kernel and
then was looking for explanations of strange behaviour. Now I think I
have it.
echo -e '\033[?25h' did nothing.
Strange. Let's then (just in case) check things that differ in our setups,
31 matches
Mail list logo
