[lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

? -- ante -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: ante wrote: Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option? I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc and -march=i486 option

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: It was added 09/15/07.  See http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018 Thank you. -- ante -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html

[lfs-support] Glibc snd -march option

Hello, I try to find a reason for the following statement in the book: Because Glibc no longer supports i386, its developers say to use the compiler flag -march=i486 when building it for x86 machines. I wasn't able to find such recommendation in documentation of glibc (files README, INSTALL,