On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
/lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
$LFS/sources/usr/bin/cpp; but /usr/bin/cpp isn't found in $LFS/sources.
It's found is
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:54 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
/lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:50 +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
So in other words, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib' and 'ln
-sv /usr/bin/cpp /lib' are equivalent?
Not quite, and the difference can be seen when you look at the link
*outside* the chroot environment (i.e where the filesystem is mounted
to
Here's what I did to build gcc:
(1). Extracted the gcc archive within the $LFS/sources directory;
(2). cd'd into gcc-4.6.2;
(3). Ran the instructions from 6.17.1. Installation of GCC;
(4). Created $LFS/sources/gcc-build and cd'd into it;
(5). Configured and compiled gcc;
(6). While still in
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp
/lib; And this is where I found it confusing, ../usr/bin/cpp ==
$LFS/sources/usr/bin/cpp; but /usr/bin/cpp isn't found in $LFS/sources.
It's found is
Got it. Thanks.
It's relative to /lib, not $LFS/sources/gcc-build as I had thought
initially.
I'll have another look at ln(1).
On 03/21/2012 10:25 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:54:18PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
(6). While still in $LFS/sources/gcc-build, I ran
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed to run
the command line while still in '/sources/gcc-build'. If that is the case,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests creating this
symlink, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib'. I assumed that I was supposed
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton rick.shel...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the instructions suggests
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Rick Shelton rick.shel...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
While working on '6.17.1. Installation of GCC', I created and cd'd into
'/sources/gcc-build'. One of the
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:55:28 +
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
So in other words, 'ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib' and 'ln -sv /usr/bin/cpp
/lib' are equivalent?
ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib is a relative symbolic link.
ln -sv /usr/bin/cpp /lib is an absolute symbolic link.
11 matches
Mail list logo