On 28/03/2014, at 16:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> François Bissey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suspect it may be a case of "to much knowledge is dangerous".
>>
>> Having some experience
>
> "some" experience is indeed a dangerous thing.
>
> in building cross compilers and bootstrapping
>> systems in the
> 1) I read it as the gcc pass 1 build just requires the in-tree sources
> of gmp, mpfr and mpc.
>
>
Hello Rob,
I agree with you about the compiling lfs (linux from scratch) from
source. I have downloaded LFS v 6.3 and I am planning on compiling this.
I haven't got the understanding of compilin
wayne mcdanolds wrote:
>> 1) I read it as the gcc pass 1 build just requires the in-tree sources
>> of gmp, mpfr and mpc.
>>
>>
> Hello Rob,
> I agree with you about the compiling lfs (linux from scratch) from
> source. I have downloaded LFS v 6.3 and I am planning on compiling this.
> I haven'
On 28 March 2014 03:07, François Bissey
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suspect it may be a case of "to much knowledge is dangerous".
>
> Having some experience in building cross compilers and bootstrapping
> systems in the past I found some elements in that chapter troubling
> enough to stop and post here fir
François Bissey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suspect it may be a case of "to much knowledge is dangerous".
>
> Having some experience
"some" experience is indeed a dangerous thing.
in building cross compilers and bootstrapping
> systems in the past I found some elements in that chapter troubling
> enough
Hi,
I suspect it may be a case of "to much knowledge is dangerous".
Having some experience in building cross compilers and bootstrapping
systems in the past I found some elements in that chapter troubling
enough to stop and post here first:
1) There are instructions to download and unpack gmp,m
