On 02/16/2014 12:59 PM, Frans de Boer wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while the rest of the wor
As a new and inexperienced member of an established community, I try to keep my
mouth shut and avoid interfering. Occasionally I feel strongly enough on a
subject to speak out and I hope that the below does not upset too many people...
> - Original Message -
> From: Frans de Boer
> ...
Frans de Boer wrote:
> Hm, the reason I posted it in the first place was just because I noticed
> that Bruce his name was attached to systemd - somewhere. I can't find it
> any more but still my question stands.
That's just a svn version where the editor has not been updated yet.
-- Bruce
--
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even
>On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
>Frans de Boer wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:41:16 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> On 02/16/2014 02:55 PM, akhiezer wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> >> From:
On 02/16/2014 02:55 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
>> From: Frans de Boer
>> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
>> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> It looks like most Linux distrib
On 02/16/2014 01:52 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 16.2.2014 12:59, Frans de Boer wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
>> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
>> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS st
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:59:19 +0100
> From: Frans de Boer
> To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] systemd versus sysvinit
>
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even
On 16.2.2014 12:59, Frans de Boer wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
> sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
> knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
> while the rest of the world i
Dear All,
It looks like most Linux distributions are switching to systemd from
sysvinit. As Bruce is even one of the (co-?)authors of systemd, the
knowledge is already in the house. Why would (x)LFS stick to sysvinit
while the rest of the world is moving to systemd?
Of course, simplicity might
11 matches
Mail list logo
