On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 12:07 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate partition.
That's really the only problem with using /var/run.
If I had to count using my fingers how many systems I have worked on
that have /var mounted on a separate
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.
When was the /run
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my
On 23 March 2014 11:22, baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3
On 03/23/2014 07:32 AM, Robin wrote:
On 23 March 2014 11:22, baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.
When
baho utot wrote:
Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes. Even if it hasn't
been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent.
I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been
/var/run which by the way IS in the standard.
/var doesn't work if it is mounted
On 03/23/2014 11:58 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
baho utot wrote:
Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes. Even if it hasn't
been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent.
I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been
/var/run which by the way IS in the standard.
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:07:49 -0400
baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate
partition.
That's really the only problem with using /var/run.
Although I did toy with the idea of changing my system to have /var on
a separate
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:07:49 -0400
baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I think there are not many folks that have that on a separate
partition.
That's really the only problem with using /var/run.
Although I did toy with the idea of changing my system to
On 03/22/2014 02:59 PM, baho utot wrote:
I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.
When was the /run directory
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:32:13 -0400
From: baho utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?
On 03/22/2014 10:08 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/22/2014 02:59 PM, baho utot wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo
