Hi all,
I'm fairly new to LFS and enjoying the build so far. I've made it to
6.10 Adjusting the toolchain in Version SVN-x86_64-20070807
When I ran the command below:
grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
it returned the following:
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-
unknown-linux-gnu/lib)
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:53 AM, William Stevenson
w...@alumni.princeton.edu wrote:
I'm fairly new to LFS and enjoying the build so far. I've made it to
6.10 Adjusting the toolchain in Version SVN-x86_64-20070807
WTH?!?!?!
You are using a obslete x86_64 book, and a old one at it too.
If you
William,
I built my own box and have an Athalon processor with 4GB RAM, so I'd
like to be able to address the full 4GB. I didn't think I could do
this with a 32 bit operating system.
Also, when I went to download the LiveCD, this is the manual that came
with the most recent download from the
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM, William Stevenson
w...@alumni.princeton.edu wrote:
That said, I seemed to pass the Glibc test. There was only one extra
error and it was similar to the other nptl ones mentioned. If anyone
has any thoughts, I'd like to keep going if possible.
Uh... you should
Uh... you should switch to CLFS immediately to build this system,
becuase, the book you are using, does not have a bootloader, among
other things.
got it, thanks - will do
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, William Immendorf
will.immend...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM,
On Sunday 03 May 2009 10:56:22 William Immendorf wrote:
You are using a obslete x86_64 book, and a old one at it too.
This is wrong! It should be:
... an obslete ... an old ...
--
http://www.wowgreen.net/11324
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, genericmailli...@gmail.com wrote:
This is wrong! It should be:
... an obslete ... an old ...
What I meant by obslete, is that it isn't used anymore.
William
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:40:38PM -0500, William Immendorf wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, genericmailli...@gmail.com wrote:
This is wrong! It should be:
... an obslete ... an old ...
What I meant by obslete, is that it isn't used anymore.
William
I think he was correcting
