Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Mykal Funk wrote: > Now that I have smartctl to monitor the hard drives (thanks Mike) I'm > going to run it until it dies. I don't have to worry much as this isn't > a production machine. I'll be sure to make frequent backups. I've found > a few sites that give insight into the SMART data, and

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Mykal Funk wrote: > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 4 > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE > UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 025Pre-fail > A

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-21 Thread Mike McCarty
Mykal Funk wrote: > Mike McCarty wrote: >> Mykal Funk wrote: >> >>> While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: >>> >> Oh, if you have a distro which can use SMART, and your >> disc is SMART capable, you can ask it. >> >> # smartctl -i /dev/hda >> > This command showed that

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-19 Thread Mykal Funk
William Immendorf wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Ken Moffat > wrote: > >> I always find SMART data (specifically, the WORST and THRESHhold >> columns) causes my head to spin. My impression is that 'Worst' >> counts down, and I think the RAW_VALUE column (the last one) is >> the fi

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-19 Thread William Immendorf
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: >  I always find SMART data (specifically, the WORST and THRESHhold > columns) causes my head to spin.  My impression is that 'Worst' > counts down, and I think the RAW_VALUE column (the last one) is > the first place to look (zero in this case).

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
2009/12/19 Mykal Funk : > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE > UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE >  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000b   100   100   025    Pre-fail > Always       -       274871 >  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-18 Thread Mykal Funk
Mike McCarty wrote: > Mykal Funk wrote: > >> While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: >> > > Oh, if you have a distro which can use SMART, and your > disc is SMART capable, you can ask it. > > # smartctl -i /dev/hda > This command showed that the drive was SMART enabled,

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-18 Thread Mike McCarty
Mykal Funk wrote: > While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: Oh, if you have a distro which can use SMART, and your disc is SMART capable, you can ask it. # smartctl -i /dev/hda will tell you whether you have a SMART capable disc, and whether it be enabled. If your disc is SMART

Re: irq timeout error

2009-12-18 Thread Mike McCarty
Mykal Funk wrote: > While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: > > hda: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } > hda: possibly failed opcode: 0xc4 > ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xd4, count=1 > ide0: reset: success > hda: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } > hda: possibly failed opc

irq timeout error

2009-12-18 Thread Mykal Funk
While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: hda: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } hda: possibly failed opcode: 0xc4 ide0: unexpected interrupt, status=0xd4, count=1 ide0: reset: success hda: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } hda: possibly failed opcode: 0x20 ide0: unexpected interru