Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
Best regards,
Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
Best regards,
Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Denis Silin wrote:
Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
Best regards,
Alex
I'm not sure what you mean. The whole point of LFS is to use the host
system tools to build the LFS system.
--
El Miércoles, 4 de Octubre de 2006 11:31, Denis Silin escribió:
For example, why should I build GCC, using the GCC, that I just have? Can I
just copy it to my LFS partition? What is the difference between the GCC in
host Linux and the GCC, that I will build from sources?
Your existing gcc is
Alberto Hernando wrote:
El Miércoles, 4 de Octubre de 2006 10:00, Alan Lord escribió:
You can now (apparently) run this with ONLY xorg 7.1 and the beta Nvidia
driver. No need for Xgl or AIGLX any more :-) I haven't tried this yet
If you try it, could you tell us in case of success?
Thx
I
El Miércoles, 4 de Octubre de 2006 11:52, Alan Lord escribió:
I'll
drop a note on the general list, as it shouldn't really be on this one
here...
Ok.
If this doesn't fit here, which is the general list where this should go?
Alberto
--
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 09:00 +0100, Alan Lord wrote:
You can now (apparently) run this with ONLY xorg 7.1 and the beta Nvidia
driver. No need for Xgl or AIGLX any more :-)
As I understand it, AIGLX isn't anything separate - it's a part of xorg
7.1 that works with any driver supporting the
Denis Silin wrote:
Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
You probably could (with a recent distribution), but you will most
likely get a lot of linking errors as this is not The Clean Way.
What's the advantage of
Hi,
Although, I have installed xorg-7.1 with blfs-svn-20060919 on my P-IV but I
am not happy with it.
The problem is as under:
1. If I install both 'mesa' and 'dri' then there is no display and no
error is displayed in terminal
as well as in log.
2. If I comment out 'glx' module, then
On 10/4/06, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
On 10/3/06, Simon Geard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been a while since I experimented with it, but as I recall compiz
doesn't provide window decorations at all, delegating that to
gnome-window-decorator. Is there not a KDE equivalent to that program?
I forgot about that part. It looks like there
On 10/4/06, randhir phagura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although, I have installed xorg-7.1 with blfs-svn-20060919 on my P-IV but I
am not happy with it.
The problem is as under:
1. If I install both 'mesa' and 'dri' then there is no display and no
error is displayed in terminal
as well as
On 10/3/06, Simon Geard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 20:55 -0500, Arnie Stender wrote:
Hi Dan,
popt aside for a moment, when I go to the first link you provided I get
the following. Am I missing some sort of plugin or XML support for
SeaMonkey? This doesn't look
Hi,
I seem to get stuck at the section 5.3.1 of the book, during the make
install of binutils. I am trying to build the LFS system using the LFS Live
CD as a host. This is the output from make install:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ make install
/bin/sh ../binutils-2.1.16/mkinstalldirs
On 10/4/06, Denis Silin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
I don't see any reason not to, but that would ruin the point of using
LFS. You might as well just install Linspire.
--
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 10/4/06, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Vladimir Marcu wrote:
I seem to get stuck at the section 5.3.1 of the book, during the make
install of binutils. I am trying to build the LFS system using the LFS
Live
CD as a host. This is the output from make install:
[...]
mkdir -p -- /tools /tools
mkdir: cannot create directory
Original Message
From: Brandon Peirce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 3:57:38 PM
Subject: Re: GCC-3.4.1-Pass1 problem
Richard Caldwell wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
That host system is too new to build that old version of LFS. You
Luca wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 10/4/06, Luca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/sources/Gnome-2.16/xorg-server-1.1.1/hw/xgl'
make[1]: ***
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:21:48PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
No, what you're seeing is the build instructions for the popt package,
stored in an XML file (since that's what Paldo's automated builder
uses). But if you strip off the XML tags, you've basically got:
sed -i -e
Dear all,
thanks for your help. gcc -dumpmachine was indeed pointing to a
non-existent folder. I have started from scratch and checked gcc
-dumpmachine after each installation. It is now pointing to
i686-pc-linux-gnu, so I assume I made a typo while compling GCC.
Thanks again
Simon
On
Found it! Well, almost...
Its a bug with taglib 1.4. I could use the binaries from my old
system, but the one compiled at lfs 6.2 wont work with amarok nor juk!
Strange! taglib 1.3.1 works very well!
I am trying to check what is wrong with 1.4, but it seens that I am
in the right path now!
--
Hello to everyone - i am a first time lfs user and so far i haven't had any
issues by following the book until now. I was able to compile the kernel
and boot without using the lfs livecd but when i got to the login prompt i
got several usb error -110. At the same time, when i looked into the
James Stavrou wrote:
Hello to everyone - i am a first time lfs user and so far i haven't had
any issues by following the book until now. I was able to compile the
kernel and boot without using the lfs livecd but when i got to the login
prompt i got several usb error -110. At the same time,
I tried both and i get the same two issues. i also noticed that in the lfs
livecd dmesg something about:
scsi2 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
that i don't have in my system.
I need to research that some more - if anyone can think of anything else,
please let me know.
btw -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:21:48PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
No, what you're seeing is the build instructions for the popt package,
stored in an XML file (since that's what Paldo's automated builder
uses). But if you strip off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Guys,
Since I have embarked on my trek through BLFS I have built a lot of
different packages some of which had user applications. It seems to me
that at some point after building GNOME there was an application or
script that I ran that I
After some more research and looking into the usb debug statements i found
one
usb 4-1: khubd timed out on ep0in len=18/64 and multiple
khubd timed out on ep0out len=0/0 each one before the
device not accepting address [2,..,5] error -110.
also, i haven't been able to tell why the scsi
28 matches
Mail list logo
