Mauricio Casanova wrote:
VFS: Cannot open root device hda3 or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
Do you have SATA? I had problems with grub/SATA once, because Gentoo's
livecd recognized
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3 tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while trying to upgrade my glibc from 2.3.3-lfs to 2.3.6
(because of x264 using sched_getaffinity() with 2 parms, glibc not
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:52:55AM -0800, Zeb Packard wrote:
I'm using the more_control helpers method of package management with
6.2 on running 'make -k check' on gcc my gcc summary is as such:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of
That was my first inclination just install it, but then I read the
warning and decided to look at stuff. After looking, I actually
thought that it was handling comments improperly. I rebuilt it without
'unexpected errors' and I was just about to post a nevermind, but
thanks for looking at it.
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:31:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3 tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while trying to upgrade my glibc from 2.3.3-lfs to 2.3.6
On 07/01/07 19:40:50, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:31:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3
tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while
After something like 14 years, I'm looking to change my Linux
distribution for an increasingly numerous list of beefs
I burned the LFS ISO and looked around somewhat and skimmed through
the books
What I see so far impresses me most favourably
However, I am not vi literate and need to know how
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:05:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry my mail is not clear. I have an LFS 5.1.1 nearly three years old
and pretty big, so I'm not happy with doing a new LFS if I can't use what I
did in BLFS sinc then.
Upgrading is the one thing we probably
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:40:57PM +0100, Slackrat wrote:
However, I am not vi literate and need to know how difficult it will
be to install emacs/gnus/erc as I am heavily dependent upon the emacs
appz
For emacs itself, see
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/emacs.html
Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:40:57PM +0100, Slackrat wrote:
However, I am not vi literate and need to know how difficult it will
be to install emacs/gnus/erc as I am heavily dependent upon the emacs
appz
For emacs itself, see
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but the patches
I got for coreutils are generally failing to find the right files.
It's not a big problem (I don't think) it just seems like the patches
point to the wrong version. For instance
coreutils-5.96-suppress_uptime_kill_su-1.patch
On Monday 08 January 2007 01:36, Zeb Packard wrote:
coreutils-5.96-suppress_uptime_kill_su-1.patch
looks for 'coreutils-5.94/src/Makefile.in'
It asks me for the file to patch then I tell it to look for v 5.96 and
all is ok.
On the first hand, you're right and it should be 5.96.
On the
A lot of these patches can be applied even though the version referenced
in the patch is an older version. There is no sense re-inventing the
wheel if the current patch works.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Hi,
This is my first try with the LFS project. I am stuck
at the first pass (5.10 in the book) with the
installation of TCL-8.4.7.
I ran the test for the compiler and linker and it
seems fine.
I get the following output when running the configure
command (./configure --prefix=/tools in the unix
14 matches
Mail list logo
