Hi,
This is my first crack at LFS. I'm wandering if the error associated with
the link below was ever resolved?
*Previous and related errors:*
http://www.mail-archive.com/lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org/msg14143.html
*My setup:*
- Book 6.7
- 64 bit -- athlon x2
- host kernel =
FYI: The compiler segfault below created one of my test errors that I
reported earlier. -- This is one I guess I can legitimately ignore?
Not sure about the remaining errors:
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: ***
Casey,
Hmm... it appears that you didn't run one of the commands given in the
book.
QUOTING FROM THE BOOK: Section 6.9
When running *make install*, a script called test-installation.pl performs a
small sanity test on our newly installed Glibc. However, because our
toolchain still points to the
Hi.
I build lfs 6.7 and on step 6.12. Binutils-2.20.1 have next problem:
root:/sources/binutils-build# expect -c spawn ls
spawn ls
The system has no more ptys. Ask your system administrator to create
more.
while executing
spawn ls
Seems that all steps before - is Ok.
All founded solves
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:42:27 +0400
sannikov sanni...@cs.karelia.ru wrote:
Hi.
I build lfs 6.7 and on step 6.12. Binutils-2.20.1 have next problem:
root:/sources/binutils-build# expect -c spawn ls
spawn ls
The system has no more ptys. Ask your system administrator to create
more.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:07:35 +0100, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:42:27 +0400
sannikov sanni...@cs.karelia.ru wrote:
Hi.
I build lfs 6.7 and on step 6.12. Binutils-2.20.1 have next problem:
root:/sources/binutils-build# expect -c spawn ls
spawn ls
The
Hi Bruce,
I have finisched building LFS-6.6. It is working smootly, it tooks only a few
days to build it.
Thank you very much for all the work involved with the book ! It is an
excellent guide.
I used Fedora 13 as a basis this time. Talking about LFS SVN-20101018.
The compilation of GCC-4.5.1
Hi Edgar,
I'm curious about your Fedora 13 basis. I have been using RH and Fedora
for many years but never really dug into linux like this. I have finally
become frustrated enough with the maintenance/upgrade issues that I decided
to take more control.
Can you perhaps describe (to whatever
John Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
I'm wandering if it makes any sense to configure /etc/ld.so.conf to include
lib64 directories
- /usr/local/lib64
- /opt/lib64
I guess this can always be added later?
Yes. Note that LFS does not build a multilib system as multilib is not
needed if
Hi,
I don't quite understand how re-writing the 'specs' file under the '/tools'
directory actually works -- by the way it does work!.
The specs file that is written with the fancy 'sed' script shows up as:
/tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.1/specs
I don't get how writing the spec
On 10/23/10 04:04, Andrew Benton wrote:
/tools is available in chroot, that's why we make the
/tools = /mnt/lfs/tools symlink. The programs are installed
into /tools, the linker links to it's libraries in /tools/lib. Then
when you're in chroot everything is in the right place using the
lfs wrote:
On 10/23/10 04:04, Andrew Benton wrote:
/tools is available in chroot, that's why we make the
/tools = /mnt/lfs/tools symlink. The programs are installed
into /tools, the linker links to it's libraries in /tools/lib. Then
when you're in chroot everything is in the right place
12 matches
Mail list logo
