Re: Slightly OT: Building with a VM
me,apporc wrote:
Hi
Is there a book or someting like which i can refer to for these knowledge
about disks , images files and partitions .
I use the man pages a lot.
I don't know how to mount a partition in a image file with offset .I want to
know detailed knowledge about this . I hope you can give me an advice.
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
Hi I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs: Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp ... ERROR: /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc: compilation failed FAIL: Build libdnew1a.so with --Bsymbolic-functions --dynamic-list-cpp-new ERROR: /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc: compilation failed FAIL: Build libdnew1b.so with --dynamic-list-data --dynamic-list-cpp-new FAIL: Run with libnew1a.so FAIL: Run with libnew1b.so Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/tls_common.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/wrap.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elfcomm/elfcomm.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/elfweak.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-fastcall/fastcall.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-frv/fdpic.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-frv/frv-elf.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-frv/tls.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-gc/gc.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-h8300/h8300.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-ia64/ia64.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-ia64/line.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/binutils.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-libs/libs.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-linkonce/linkonce.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-m68hc11/m68hc11.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-m68k/m68k-got.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-m68k/m68k.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-mep/mep.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf-flags.e xp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-mmix/mmix.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-mn10300/mn10300.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-pe/pe-compile.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-pe/pe-run.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-pe/pe-run2.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-pe/pe.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-pie/pie.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/plugin.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-powerpc/aix52.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-powerpc/powerpc.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-s390/s390.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/align.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/alignof.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/assert.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/crossref.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/data.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/default-script.ex p ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/defined.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/dynamic-sections. exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-aligned.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-orphan.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/expr.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/extern.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/include.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/map-address.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/overlay-size.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/phdrs.exp ... Running /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.21/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/phdrs2.exp ... Running
Re: Error compiling Expect 5.45
On 05/01/2011 09:14 PM, Graham Beck wrote: /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so: undefined reference to `openpty@GLIBC_2.0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [expect] Error 1 Unfortunately, you've given just enough information for someone to determine that the linker exited with a generic error, and that it is fussing about libutil. The line immediately above the three you've sent, begins with 'gcc' (it should take up about 6 lines on an 80 column terminal), and immediately above that is a line that contains 'rm -f libexpect5.45.so'. You will need to send all 5 of those lines for somebody to make more than a guess about the cause of the issue. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Error compiling Expect 5.45
Oh, sorry - still finding my way here. Here is a fuller output: i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -B/tools/lib/ \ -pipe -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fPIC \ -Wl,--export-dynamic \ -o expect exp_main_exp.o \ -L/mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45 -lexpect5.45 \ -L/tools/lib -ltcl8.5 \ -ldl -lieee -lm \ -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib \ -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib/expect5.45 /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: libutil.so.1, needed by /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so: undefined reference to `openpty@GLIBC_2.0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [expect] Error 1 On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:28 AM, DJ Lucas d...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: On 05/01/2011 09:14 PM, Graham Beck wrote: /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so: undefined reference to `openpty@GLIBC_2.0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [expect] Error 1 Unfortunately, you've given just enough information for someone to determine that the linker exited with a generic error, and that it is fussing about libutil. The line immediately above the three you've sent, begins with 'gcc' (it should take up about 6 lines on an 80 column terminal), and immediately above that is a line that contains 'rm -f libexpect5.45.so'. You will need to send all 5 of those lines for somebody to make more than a guess about the cause of the issue. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Error compiling Expect 5.45
... and I've just found the 'rm -f libexpect5.45.so' line above that DJ Lucas mentioned was needed. So here's the necessary output: rm -f libexpect5.45.so i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -B/tools/lib/ -shared -pipe -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fPIC -Wl,--export-dynamic -o libexpect5.45.so exp_command.o expect.o exp_inter.o exp_regexp.o exp_tty.o exp_log.o exp_main_sub.o exp_pty.o exp_trap.o exp_strf.o exp_console.o exp_glob.o exp_win.o exp_clib.o exp_closetcl.o exp_memmove.o exp_tty_comm.o exp_chan.o Dbg.o pty_termios.o exp_select.o exp_event.o -lutil -lieee -lm -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib -L/tools/lib -ltclstub8.5 : libexpect5.45.so i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -B/tools/lib/ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\expect\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\expect\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\5.45\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\expect\ 5.45\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\\ -DBUILD_expect= -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -DMODULE_SCOPE=extern\ __attribute__\(\(__visibility__\(\hidden\\)\)\) -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_TYPE=long\ long -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT64=1 -DHAVE_OPEN64=1 -DHAVE_LSEEK64=1 -DHAVE_TYPE_OFF64_T=1 -DUSE_TCL_STUBS=1 -DUSE_TCL_STUBS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SELECT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYSMACROS_H=1 -DHAVE_STROPTS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H=1 -DRETSIGTYPE=void -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_TM_TM_ZONE=1 -DHAVE_TM_ZONE=1 -DHAVE_GMTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1 -DHAVE_OPENPTY=1 -DHAVE_MEMMOVE=1 -DHAVE_SYSCONF=1 -DHAVE_STRFTIME=1 -DHAVE_STRCHR=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE=1 -DHAVE_SIGLONGJMP=1 -DHAVE_MEMCPY=1 -DWNOHANG_BACKUP_VALUE=1 -DSELECT_MASK_TYPE=fd_set -DHAVE_PTMX=1 -DHAVE_TCSETATTR=1 -DPOSIX=1 -DHAVE_TERMIO=1 -DHAVE_TERMIOS=1 -DSETPGRP_VOID=1 -DHAVE_SV_TIMEZONE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_FILE_NAMES=1 -DTCL_DEBUGGER -DUSE_NON_CONST -DSCRIPTDIR=\/tools/lib/expect5.45\ -DEXECSCRIPTDIR=\/tools/lib/expect5.45\ -DSTTY_BIN=\/bin/stty\ -DDFLT_STTY=\sane\ -I. -I. -I/tools/include-pipe -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fPIC -c `echo exp_main_exp.c` -o exp_main_exp.o i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -B/tools/lib/ \ -pipe -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -fPIC \ -Wl,--export-dynamic \ -o expect exp_main_exp.o \ -L/mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45 -lexpect5.45 \ -L/tools/lib -ltcl8.5 \ -ldl -lieee -lm \ -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib \ -Wl,-rpath,/tools/lib/expect5.45 /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: libutil.so.1, needed by /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /mnt/lfs/sources/expect5.45/libexpect5.45.so: undefined reference to `openpty@GLIBC_2.0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [expect] Error 1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: setclock Question (lfs-bootscripts-20110424)
May 1, 2011 12:12:01 AM, neal.p.murphy wrote. Hi Neil, Thank you very much for your comments. I'm trying to comment on your comments now. Alex said: '/lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules': SUBSYSTEM==rtc, DRIVERS==rtc_cmos, SYMLINK+=rtc FWIW, I don't see the relevance of rule 50-udev Neil said: The rule in 50-udev creates the symlink '/dev/rtc' to the actual node '/dev/rtc0'. It isn't relevant to the clock being set or not being set. Alex is saying: 1. On all my queries, there's NO 'SUBSYSTEM==rtc'. To reinforce to the readers (in case they missed it), I had asked, What is a possible configuration that would trigger the _SUBSYSTEM_ action in 55-lfs (2) ? Neil answered: *As written*, the subsystem rule is triggered *if* the RTC is in subsystem rtc; if there is no such subsystem, the rule will never be triggered. The kernel rule will never be triggered because it is looking for a device with kernel name 'rtc'; this device doesn't exist. If this rule is changed to look for a device with correct kernel name of 'rtc0', it will be triggered. Alex is saying: What rtc0 are we talking about? As a reminder to the readers (in case they missed it), I had written, ls -l /dev/rtc* crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 135 2011-04-30 20:32 /dev/rtc [please note the star above] Alex said: I'm still puzzled about not being able to find any traces on the console about 'setclock' being run by udev (55-lfs above). Is it possible that inside udevd the standard message Setting system clock... goes somewhere else? The log-fog? Neil answered: The log level may be set to, or default to, 'err'. If you change it via udevadm control --log-priority=info or udevadm control --log-priority=debug you should see all the info you're looking for--'debug' will show a *ton* of info. Alex is saying: 1. I'm not so sure. You're suggestion works only during a live system to change log levels dynamically (as they say). Would work like when you through another clock (like a grandfather's) at the machine and you want to see how udevd reacts in detail :) Our case (whether setclock script is run by Udev on start-up or not) is obviously a booting situation par excellence. You prepare for it _before_ reboot by statically setting the _following_ udevd log-level in '/etc/udev/udev.conf' (from say, default err to debug). 2. That said, there's NO trace (so to speak) of a setclock run what so ever (as they type now a days) in the debug-log. OTOH, I have now positive proof that udev _does_ run setclock on start-up. That's a 360 (as they say) reversal of what I said in my previous post. Rest assured, the crow has already been boiled, enjoyed and the green remains ecologically disposed of. Alex, on departing, is raising some new questions: Based on already (twice) mentioned ls -l /dev/rtc* crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 135 2011-04-30 20:32 /dev/rtc, I'm speculating that the difference between me and the rest of users (see also Simon's previous post of May 2, 2011 04:19:34 AM) who can proudly display a /dev/rtc0 (with a /dev/rtc symlink) or some such, is that I have CONFIG_RTC set to M as opposed to [Y] :( Questions: 1. Can this be true (a well known fact to everybody else)? (I know, I know, recompile the kernel with [Y] and see what happens :) As a matter of principle, I've always favored kernel/Udev to decide for me what module(s) is needed and when. 2. Normally, the kernel configuration has been careful to make a distinction between [Y/N] and [Y/M/N] depending on the situation. Is this a mis-coordination between Kernel and Udev, and the RTC _must_ be either Y or N (i.e., no M)? All I can certify is that my machines, always with M, have worked very smoothly (RTC-wise) all these years. I've never ever missed a /dev/rtc17 or the symlink. Thanks, -- Alex -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brett brettsca...@email.com wrote: Hi I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs: For the error in new.cc you need to remove the include exception_defines.h from the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc or see http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/32431 For the errors in the selective test find the following line in the file ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp set cxxflags -fvtable-gc -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti and remove -fvtable-gc parameter or see http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00189.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: setclock Question (lfs-bootscripts-20110424)
al...@verizon.net wrote: That's a 360 (as they say) reversal of what I said in my previous post. Not sure if I got the attribution right. LOL. I think you mean 180. :) -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
Manuel Gonzalez Montoya wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brett brettsca...@email.com wrote: Hi I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs: For the error in new.cc you need to remove the include exception_defines.h from the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc or see http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/32431 sed -i /exception_defines.h/d ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc For the errors in the selective test find the following line in the file ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp set cxxflags -fvtable-gc -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti and remove -fvtable-gc parameter or see http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00189.html sed -i s/-fvtable-gc // ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp I created a ticket to make these fixes. Thanks. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:45:59PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Manuel Gonzalez Montoya wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brett brettsca...@email.com wrote: Hi I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs: For the error in new.cc you need to remove the include exception_defines.h from the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc or see http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/32431 sed -i /exception_defines.h/d ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc For the errors in the selective test find the following line in the file ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp set cxxflags -fvtable-gc -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti and remove -fvtable-gc parameter or see http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00189.html sed -i s/-fvtable-gc // ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp I created a ticket to make these fixes. Thanks. -- Bruce Glad Manuel has provided a fix to disable that test (although it comes down to what I don't know about cannot harm me ;). I haven't built recently, but I'd just like to note that (at least on x86_64) during the past 3 years I've *often* seen failures in 'ld' tests, but everything has still worked ok. I think the ld tests are *good* at testing corner cases, and that seeing some failures there is not necessarily a reason to worry. The fix is nice and tidy, but I do wonder if it might be better to accept [ at least for people using the development book ] that tests fail when the infrastructure changes (in this case, newer gcc) ? But, I've no strong feelings either way. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: setclock Question (lfs-bootscripts-20110424)
May 2, 2011 05:24:23 PM, Bruce wrote: Alex wrote: That's a 360 (as they say) reversal of what I said in my previous post. Not sure if I got the attribution right.LOL. I think you mean 180. :) Hi Bruce, This is a relatively known joke (expression) in relative wide use. It is attributed to Sammy Davis Jr. Etymology: during a conversation/interview he said something like He did a full 360 meaning a complete change of opinion/attitude etc. IMHO, he, as a top notch performer, can be forgiven for not being too versed in geometry, when we all, technical people, know full well that a complete reversal in direction actually involves making a turn of 270 degrees (Celsius :) -- Alex PS I expect the story to be found on YouTube somewhere. I definitely remember hearing it on a sound bite at the time. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: lfs-support Digest, Vol 2302, Issue 2
hi all
in my system windows was there on -sda1,sda2-extended partition ,personal
data drive-sda5
i am doing lfs6.7(book)- on sda6,swap-sda7(i am using lfs-livecd)
---
see this is my grub.cfg file
root:/# cat /boot/grub/grub.cfg
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
load_env
fi
set default=0
if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then
set saved_entry=${prev_saved_
- Hide quoted text -
entry}
save_env saved_entry
set prev_saved_entry=
save_env prev_saved_entry
set boot_once=true
fi
function savedefault {
if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then
saved_entry=${chosen}
save_env saved_entry
fi
}
insmod ext2
set root='(hd0,6)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set f02e767d-d75e-4e3c-93ac-85d3fdadcec0
set locale_dir=($root)/boot/grub/locale
set lang=
insmod gettext
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 --class gnu-linux --class
gnu --class os {
insmod ext2
set root='(hd0,6)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set
f02e767d-d75e-4e3c-93ac-85d3fdadcec0
echoLoading Linux 2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 ...
linux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 root=/dev/sda6 ro
}
menuentry GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 (recovery mode) --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
insmod ext2
set root='(hd0,6)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set
f02e767d-d75e-4e3c-93ac-85d3fdadcec0
echoLoading Linux 2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 ...
linux /boot/vmlinux-2.6.35.4-lfs-6.7 root=/dev/sda6 ro single
}
### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
### END /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type
the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
### END /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
-
right now i am here
8.4.3. Testing the Configuration
/sbin/reboot
...
grub root (hd0,6)
grub kernel /boot/grub/core.img
grub boot
question: when i issued above command its rebooted
on screen
one warning came and
stopping process
stopping process...
stopping process
take cd remove cr tray,press enter
--
so i removed cd and i pressed enter
then its directly booted into windows
why its not return to root(means to lfs)
i would appreciate any help
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: lfs-support Digest, Vol 2302, Issue 2
janu mam wrote: hi all in my system windows was there on -sda1,sda2-extended partition ,personal data drive-sda5 i am doing lfs6.7(book)- on sda6,swap-sda7(i am using lfs-livecd) --- see this is my grub.cfg file /sbin/reboot ... grub root (hd0,6) grub kernel /boot/grub/core.img grub boot question: when i issued above command its rebooted on screen one warning came and stopping process stopping process... stopping process take cd remove cr tray,press enter -- so i removed cd and i pressed enter then its directly booted into windows why its not return to root(means to lfs) i would appreciate any help The reason you get windows is that the book assumes that your MBR boots to Grub. Your system's MBR still has a Windows boot loader. You will have to do 'grub-setup /dev/sda' and forgo the testing in section 8.4.3. To get to windows from grub, you will need to do the following either from the grub command line or grub.cfg insmod chain insmod ntfs set root=(hd0,1) chainloader +1 See http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/Chain_002dloading.html#Chain_002dloading -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
Hi Manuel Gonzalez Montoya wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Brett brettsca...@email.com wrote: Hi I am trying to build LFS SVN-20110427 on an AMD64 system I get a consistent failure when running the checks for Binutils in chapter 6. This is the output where the error occurs: For the error in new.cc you need to remove the include exception_defines.h from the file ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc or see http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.support/32431 sed -i /exception_defines.h/d ld/testsuite/ld-elf/new.cc For the errors in the selective test find the following line in the file ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp set cxxflags -fvtable-gc -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti and remove -fvtable-gc parameter or see http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00189.html sed -i s/-fvtable-gc // ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp I created a ticket to make these fixes. Thanks. -- Bruce That worked fine, thanks Brett -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Binutils 2.21 - check failure in chapter 6.13
Glad Manuel has provided a fix to disable that test (although it comes down to what I don't know about cannot harm me ;). I haven't built recently, but I'd just like to note that (at least on x86_64) during the past 3 years I've *often* seen failures in 'ld' tests, but everything has still worked ok. I think the ld tests are *good* at testing corner cases, and that seeing some failures there is not necessarily a reason to worry. The fix is nice and tidy, but I do wonder if it might be better to accept [ at least for people using the development book ] that tests fail when the infrastructure changes (in this case, newer gcc) ? But, I've no strong feelings either way. ĸen I don't think I have strong feelings either way either but a warning about possible failures would be helpful even if a fix isn't written up. I spent a lot of time trying to find out if the failures were significant but wasn't able to find the info until this list pointed me in the right direction. Thanks for the help Brett -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
