Re: What happened if I stop the make check?
Webmaster wrote: Sometimes I don't have much time to wait it so I pressed Ctrl+C. Are there any side effects if I stop it? It depends upon when it is done. If you simply $ make and then $ make check then likely there is no problem. If, however, the $ make check is the first command, then you may kill the initial build in the middle. Mike -- p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Question about the 'K' and 'S' in script names in /etc/rc.d/rc{0, 6}.d
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Theodore You wrote: The book says in chapter 7.3: Links that start with an S in the rc0.d and rc6.d directories will not cause anything to be started. They will be called with the parameter stop to stop something. If so, why are there still scripts starting with an S in these two directories? Why not change all S to K? When changing to any run level, the rc script is run. It goes through the K entries with a stop. For runlevels 0 and 6, all the S entries are also run, in order, with a stop. For runlevels 1-5, The S entries are run with a start. According to the rc script, if an S entry was started in previous runlevel, and not stopped in current runlevel, it will be skipped, but if we are switching to runlevel 0 or 6, this script won't be stopped. Is this intended or I'm wrong? For runlevels 0 and 6, this lets us shut down in the order started (K entries) and then run the S entries, in order, to actually halt or restart the system. If we want to change the order of these scripts, we can simply change the number of the script, I still think there's no need for the S. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Question about the 'K' and 'S' in script names in /etc/rc.d/rc{0, 6}.d
Theodore You wrote: On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Theodore You wrote: The book says in chapter 7.3:   Links that start with an S in the rc0.d and rc6.d directories will   not cause anything to be started. They will be called with the   parameter stop to stop something. If so, why are there still scripts starting with an S in these two directories? Why not change all S to K? When changing to any run level, the rc script is run.  It goes through the K entries with a stop.  For runlevels 0 and 6, all the S entries are also run, in order, with a stop.  For runlevels 1-5, The S entries are run with a start. According to the rc script, if an S entry was started in previous runlevel, and not stopped in current runlevel, it will be skipped, but if we are switching to runlevel 0 or 6, this script won't be stopped. Is this intended or I'm wrong? For runlevels 0 and 6, this lets us shut down in the order started (K entries) and then run the S entries, in order, to actually halt or restart the system. If we want to change the order of these scripts, we can simply change the number of the script, I still think there's no need for the S. Your distro, your rules. What we have is the way it's done on most distros that still use sysvinit. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page