Re: [lfs-support] problem with glibc
Lázaro Morales wrote:
En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0301@gmail.**
com ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com escribió:
after running the version.sh script the following is the output
ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
should be bash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.21.53.20110810
bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.1
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
I don't know what this is. It should be:
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison
bzip2, Version 1.0.5, 10-Dec-2007.
Coreutils: 8.5
diff (GNU diffutils) 3.0
find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2
GNU Awk 3.1.8
/usr/bin/awk - /usr/bin/gawk
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1
(Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.13-20ubuntu5.1) 2.13
I don't know if this works or not.
grep (GNU grep) 2.9
gzip 1.3.12
Linux version 3.0.0-17-generic (buildd@roseapple) (gcc version 4.6.1
(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) ) #30-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 8 17:34:21 UTC
2012
m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16
GNU Make 3.81
patch 2.6.1
Perl version='5.12.4';
GNU sed version 4.2.1
tar (GNU tar) 1.25
Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13
xz (XZ Utils) 5.0.0
gcc compilation OK
That output is correct.
No, it's not.
-- Bruce
I have changed the link of /bin/bash and /usr/bin/yacc and whta about the
problem pointed out with gcc is it goin to work or what changes i have to
make.
Thank you
-Ankit
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] problem with glibc
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:13:11 +0100 ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com wrote: after running the version.sh script the following is the output ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release /bin/sh - /bin/dash Fix this. You can't do LFS with dash, it won't work. sudo ln -sf bash /bin/sh Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] problem with glibc
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100 Lázaro Morales laz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote: En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarma ankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com escribió: after running the version.sh script the following is the output ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release /bin/sh - /bin/dash That output is correct. No it isn't. Dash won't work for LFS. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs live cd and being blind
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:12:08 +0100 Eleanore Boyd cara...@cox.net wrote: On 3/29/2012 11:03 AM, mike wrote: hi, I am blind and build my lfs's usually using grml and an ssh session but was wondering if their is a way to get the lfs live cd to start with speakup for building? I am working on getting accessibility support back into the livecd in general, and am trying to replace the GNOME window manager with fluxbox, so it might be a while before it can without breaking. To be honest, I didn't expect my announcement to generate this much interest, especially seeing as I'm just a high school student working during a computer class and after school on such things as LFS. Plus, I originally meant the announcement as wanting to know if anyone wanted to see what I did and take a few ideas from it, maybe improve on it. Has anyone else thought of remastering the Ubuntu livecd for building purposes? It would be slightly horrific if I was the only one, as I don't think I can develop and maintain this sort of thing by myself, there's a little too much that needs to be done yet.. You're a hero for even contemplating such a thing. If you build it people will use it. It will be a lot of work and as you've already found out, people will ask you to support things that you've never even thought. On the plus side, you get to be the big cheese in your own project. If you start from another distro like Ubunut you'll have to do a lot of work getting to know how they work. An alternative is to resurrect the moribund LFS LiveCD. I think doing that would have a very steep initial learning curve but once you got an initial version working you'd be working from an LFS base so you wouldn't need to learn about another distro. Personally, I'd just run away if I were you ;) Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Intltool-0.50.0 not found
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:29:58 +0100 mike msto...@jmshosting.us wrote: hi , i go to the following link and wget the file and it claims it can't any ideas? http://launchpad.net/intltool/trunk/0.50.0/+download/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz Works for me: andy@eccles:~$ wget http://launchpad.net/intltool/trunk/0.50.0/+download/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz --2012-03-30 14:17:23-- http://launchpad.net/intltool/trunk/0.50.0/+download/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz Resolving launchpad.net... 91.189.89.223, 91.189.89.222 Connecting to launchpad.net|91.189.89.223|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 303 See Other Location: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/82359793/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz [following] --2012-03-30 14:17:23-- https://launchpadlibrarian.net/82359793/intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz Resolving launchpadlibrarian.net... 91.189.89.229, 91.189.89.228 Connecting to launchpadlibrarian.net|91.189.89.229|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 142837 (139K) [application/x-tar] Saving to: `intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz' 100%[==] 142,837 537K/s in 0.3s 2012-03-30 14:17:24 (537 KB/s) - `intltool-0.50.0.tar.gz' saved [142837/142837] Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] problem with glibc
On 3/30/2012 8:02 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:29:04 +0100 Lázaro Moraleslaz...@frioclima.com.cu wrote: En 29/03/2012 14:13:05, ankit vishwakarmaankitvishwakarma0...@gmail.com escribió: after running the version.sh script the following is the output ankit@ankit-Inspiron-1012:~$ bash version-check.sh bash, version 4.2.10(1)-release /bin/sh - /bin/dash That output is correct. No it isn't. Dash won't work for LFS. Andy Dash can work, but I would suggest pasting the directions directly from the html to reduce error count. I built an LFS system from an Ubuntu livecd, and it just needs configuring now. Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs live cd and being blind
On 3/30/2012 8:15 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:12:08 +0100 Eleanore Boydcara...@cox.net wrote: On 3/29/2012 11:03 AM, mike wrote: hi, I am blind and build my lfs's usually using grml and an ssh session but was wondering if their is a way to get the lfs live cd to start with speakup for building? I am working on getting accessibility support back into the livecd in general, and am trying to replace the GNOME window manager with fluxbox, so it might be a while before it can without breaking. To be honest, I didn't expect my announcement to generate this much interest, especially seeing as I'm just a high school student working during a computer class and after school on such things as LFS. Plus, I originally meant the announcement as wanting to know if anyone wanted to see what I did and take a few ideas from it, maybe improve on it. Has anyone else thought of remastering the Ubuntu livecd for building purposes? It would be slightly horrific if I was the only one, as I don't think I can develop and maintain this sort of thing by myself, there's a little too much that needs to be done yet.. You're a hero for even contemplating such a thing. If you build it people will use it. It will be a lot of work and as you've already found out, people will ask you to support things that you've never even thought. On the plus side, you get to be the big cheese in your own project. If you start from another distro like Ubunut you'll have to do a lot of work getting to know how they work. An alternative is to resurrect the moribund LFS LiveCD. I think doing that would have a very steep initial learning curve but once you got an initial version working you'd be working from an LFS base so you wouldn't need to learn about another distro. Personally, I'd just run away if I were you ;) Andy And that is why Google, Bing, Ask, etc. are the geek's best friends. Fun trivia: Ubiquity (the Ubuntu installer) is gui-only. Therefore, when making a livecd based off of the server installation, there is no using any tool that relies on casper and ubiquity without losing the console-only interface. Whee.. Elly -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] preprocessor error
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:27:34PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:05:47PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: In my case (also with separate /boot partitions) I have a directory 'boot' on the boot partition (i.e. /boot/boot when everything is mounted) containing a symlink called 'grub' pointing to ../grub. I think that I created it (with /boot mounted, so from the host system) using mkdir /boot/boot ln s ../grub /boot/boot Say what? If you have a separate boot partition mounted on /mnt/lfs/boot (/boot within chroot) when you run grub-install, then everything should be installed in the correct location. Those extra commands should not be needed. [...] I realise that a separate /boot seems to be uncommon, even among LFS users, but the problem I had is mentioned only rarely, if at all, so maybe there is something else which contributed to it. Perhaps it was even a bug in 1.97 (failed to find the files in $root/grub). Update - I did an install on a new machine today, using LFS-7.1 with a separate /boot partition, and after building/installing grub-1.99 it did NOT need the symlink, so I guess it really was a grub-1.97 bug. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] preprocessor error
Ken Moffat wrote: Update - I did an install on a new machine today, using LFS-7.1 with a separate /boot partition, and after building/installing grub-1.99 it did NOT need the symlink, so I guess it really was a grub-1.97 bug. I didn't need it for 1.97. I think it more likely that you had an issue with your customization. In amy casy, I'm glad it's working for you now. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
